Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
The position paper will be written on an ethical dilemma of the students choice, selected from the linked case studies. Students may select any case study and may argue either position (pro or con).
You must use information from ethical theories and principles learned in class and academic sources to support your argument. Do NOT cite me or lecture notes as a source. Go to the original readings and cite published original sources.
The position papers are individual assignments. Each student must write his or her own paper without help from their classmates.
Consult the instructions for how to craft an argument or position paper here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/argument_papers/index.html (Links to an external site.)
All papers are due via turnitin by 11:59pm on the due date. There will be no exceptions made for late papers.
_____
Position Paper Instructions
Formatting and Length:
~500 words, not including references.
Use APA-style formatting for: font, font size, margins, paragraph alignment, and paragraph indentation. Details matter. You will lose points if ANY of these are incorrect.
Do NOT include extra spaces between paragraphs when you indent the first line of a paragraph. You will lose points for going over the page limit.
Do NOT include a cover page or running head.
Use of Citations: You must include a references section (not included in the page limit) that properly documents the sources you cite.
Minimum of 2 required citations:
1 citation citing the case study that you are using.
1 citation from a source from class that uses an ethical principle or moral philosophy to support your position.
Do NOT cite me or lecture notes. Go back to the readings and cite the original sources. Citing me or lecture notes does not count as a class source.
All citations and references must be in APA format. Review instructions for proper citation style here:
http://guides.library.unr.edu/general/citing (Links to an external site.)
http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx (Links to an external site.)
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/ (Links to an external site.)
Points will be deducted if you do not format your in-text citations and references list appropriately. Pay special attention to how to use and cite quotations properly.
It is considered plagiarism if you do not cite and reference your sources.
When you refer to things that you learned by reading other peoples work, you must cite them.
Writing style, punctuation, grammar: Points will be deducted for lack of clarity, typos, grammatical errors, or writing style that makes it difficult to understand your argument.
Good writing does not happen the night before an assignment is due. Start early and give yourself time to review and revise. Read your paper out loud to yourself and/or ask a friend to read it out loud to you to make sure it makes sense.
FEEDBACK
Use APA-style formatting for: font, font size, margins, paragraph alignment, and paragraph indentation. Details matter. You will lose points if ANY of these are incorrect.
Do NOT include extra spaces between paragraphs when you indent the first line of a paragraph. You will lose points for going over the page limit.
Do NOT include a cover page or running head.
Do NOT cite me or lecture notes. Go back to the readings and cite the original sources.
All citations and references must be in APA format. Review instructions for proper citation style here:
http://guides.library.unr.edu/general/citing (Links to an external site.)
http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx (Links to an external site.)
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/ (Links to an external site.)
Points will be deducted if you do not format your in-text citations and references list appropriately. Pay special attention to how to use and cite quotations properly.
: Points will be deducted for lack of clarity, typos, grammatical errors, or writing style that makes it difficult to understand your argument.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ethical Dilemma |