Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report1. Write a Quality Assurance guide for the analysis of one of the following samples; bothsamples are suspected of having a drug, but have not undergone any testing as of yet:• A bag containing 100 grams of white powder suspected to contain a controlledsubstance (drug)OR100ml of human urine suspected to contain a controlled substance (drug)Please remember to address the following topics: scope, Terminology, Testing Facility,Personnel, QA Manual Documentation, Evidence Control, Chemical Reagents,Presumptive testing and confirmatory analytical Procedures, Validation, EquipmentMaintenance and Calibration, Proficiency Testing, Audits, Deficiency ofAnalysis/Corrective Actions, and Health and Safety.Depending upon the analysis being performed, some items may not be applicablewhereas other components may need to be added.Also, remember that you canreference a number of standard procedures (SOPs) by referring to established SOPs –you do not need to provide the specifics of the analysis but rather just an overview ofthe best practice to analyze the sample – which includes optimization of availableresources such as analytical instruments and personnel. (20 points)The following FBI quality assurance guidelines summarize the essential goals and arehelpful as a reference for this module as well as for the assignment:http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/jan2005/standards/2005standards15.htm (Links to an external site.)2. This following project involves the testing and comparison of quantitative resultsproduced by two labs using two different analytical methods.A final report will need tobe created following the completion of this project.Project Scenario:Two individual laboratories (Lab A and Lab B) were contracted toanalyze 25 blood samples to determine the concentration of cocaine (and/or anymetabolites) in each sample.Both labs used instrumentation that provided quantitativeresults, but each lab used a different method.Lab A utilized liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) and Lab B utilized gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GCMS). For this project, each laboratory was tasked with analyzing the blood samplesof 25 known cocaine users.As this project involved the comparison of Lab A with Lab B’s final results, each labneeded to analyze the same 25 samples. As these labs were located in different cities,two tubes of blood were drawn from each of the 25 subjects.One blood tube was sentto Lab A and the second was sent to Lab B so that each lab would have the same 25samples to compare. Now that the testing has been completed, a final report needs tobe created to address whether or not the results from the two laboratories areequivalent. Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab ReportFor this assignment, you will need to write a brief outline for this project’s final report.This report should follow a clear structure and include all of the required components asdescribed in the module’s reading. Be sure that the report you submit includesinformation on the two labs, the two different methods used, and 25 fictitiousconcentration results per lab.Additionally, be certain to include and explain all of thecomponents that would be required for this final report as discussed in the reading. Theconcentration data must be included and a statistical analysis of that data must beincluded as a part of this report.Please consider the following when completing this assignment:* What does your fictional cocaine concentration data look like? You need to come upwith your own fictional data for this assignment (the values for the concentrations shouldbe in units of ng/mL). You must include the 25 concentration results for each lab as apart of the data as well as the results of the calculated statistics. You can simply presentthis concentration data in an Excel table or chart format* The statistical comparison needs to be calculated using either a student t-test orWilcoxon. You must perform the statistical analysis on your fictional data and compareLab A to Lab B. You must also provide a conclusion as to whether or not the twomethods were comparable.Useful links: Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab ReportCocaine analysis in various body fluids:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14750172_Cocaine_and_benzoylecgonine_in_saliva_serum_and_urine (Links to an external site.)Research report guidelines:http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/research_report_guide.html (Links to an external site.)You may also have to refresh some knowledge of statistical testing since you will becomparing two groups. Here is some reading material:“An Introduction to Statistics”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Crosby M, J Accid Emerg Med,2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725369/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-1”, DriscollP, Lecky F, Emerg Med J,2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725552/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-2”, DriscollP, Lecky F, Emerg Med J,2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725593/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Non-Parametric comparison of two groups-1”,Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J,2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725625/Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report