Dissemination Discussion

Dissemination Discussion

Table of Contents

Toggle

Instructions

Dissemination Discussion

Description

Please respond with a paragraph to the following question, add citations and references:

One internal method for dissemination would be to present it to the Evidenced-Based Practice (EBP) council at the hospital. Any time there is a change to nursing it must be approved by the EBP council. From there it is debated, approved, and then presented to the rest of the nursing staff throughout the facility. The members of the EBP council include patient care managers, an elected nursing staff member from each unit, and a few members of the administration such as the Director of Nursing Research, Professional Practice & Magnet and the Chief Nursing Officer. They would further break down the specifics and develop the new procedure prior to taking it to the nursing staff. The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) has significantly contributed to the development of nursing research. NINR is a federal agency that allocates funds for clinical and basic research and research training. Funded areas of research are based on social and political factors involving health and illness across the life span (Schmidt & Brown, 2019).

The external method for dissemination would be to bring it to the PLI project council. This committee is made up of people throughout the entire Salem Health organization. They are in charge of approving and implementing a new standardized process to all of the hospitals across the Pacific Northwest region. Communication between the two groups will differ. When bringing this to EBP council it would be a more personalized discussion on how our specific hospital would benefit from this new process and also the financial benefits. When bringing it to the PLI project council this is a more formal discussion on the benefit to the healthcare system as a whole and if this is something that they would like to see consistent throughout the organization. Beginning on a small scale by introducing it to one facility would be best. This allows time to collect data and work out any difficulties before presenting it on a larger scale. It would be apparent if it had decreased the number of opioids used and prescribed for post-operative/trauma recovery for pain management and how well the nursing staff is educated in the use and misuse of opioid medications. This is something the PLI project council would want to know.

References

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2019). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning Books.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!