Discussion on Chinese System Medicine
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99%
There are two questions to be addressed, each of which should be 300-500 words long.
As I present you to alternative ways of thinking about health in this debate, please frame your comments around your opinions. What piqued your curiosity during your “travel” to China? What astonished you the most? Discuss the ramifications of the surgery you just saw for your health.
Talk about what you noticed in the second video as well. With a stronger emphasis on what you’d see in the United States. How shocked are you that there are medical, health, and healing systems that are completely different from those in the United States?
Each post should be 300-500 words long and insightful.
The discussion in this course is based on Jean Kilbourne’s video presentation, “Killing us Softly.” She shows how American women (particularly young women in their teens or younger) are targeted in advertising in the United States. Please discuss the following (300-500 words) based on the presentation:
Was there anything in particular in the presentation that surprised you? What are some of the potential consequences (physical, emotional, and mental) of attempting to live up to our culture’s manufactured ideal picture of beauty for girls and women? What is the connection between thinness ideals and the culture fixation with dieting? Do you have an eating disorder?
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH