Discuss Your Personal Feelings and Beliefs about Writing

Discuss Your Personal Feelings and Beliefs about Writing

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Discuss Your Personal Feelings and Beliefs about Writing

Part 1

• Discuss your personal feelings and beliefs about writing.
• Describe a time in your life where miscommunication (by either you or someone else) caused a problem in your family or work environment.

Part 2

• Provide recommendations for how the miscommunication could have been alleviated or avoided.

Overview

Business and STEM leaders have repeatedly stated that learning to communicate well is a key skill needed to be successful (Jensen, 2012). “Research carried out by the Carnegie Institute of Technology shows that 85 percent of your financial success is due to . . . your personality and ability to communicate, negotiate, and lead . . . only 15 percent is due to technical knowledge” (Nelson, n.d.).

Prompt

To complete this activity, write a short paper based on the claim that information technology professionals should excel in their communication skills.

In your paper:

• Define academic, professional, and technical communication in your own words, using at least two examples.
• Discuss whether you believe the ability to communicate well is the most important skill for a STEM professional to learn.

Resources are not required, but any resources used must be appropriately cited using APA style. While all course materials are valuable resources for this project, the following resource may directly help support your work on this project:

• Shapiro Library – APA Style: Basics

Guidelines for Submission

Submit a Word document or PDF file of your short paper. Your paper must:

• Be at least 500 words
• Be double spaced
• Address all of the requirements in the Prompt section

References

Jensen, K. (2012, April 12). Intelligence is overrated: What you really need to succeed. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/keldjensen/2012/04/12/intelligence-is-overrated-what-you-really-need-to-succeed/#563997cab6d2

Nelson, B. (n.d.). Three billionaires reveal the underrated skill you really need to succeed (and it’s not intelligence). Reader’s Digest. Retrieved from https://www.rd.com/advice/work-career/secret-to-success-billionaires/

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Discuss Your Personal Feelings and Beliefs about Writing

Discuss Your Personal Feelings and Beliefs about Writing

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!