Discuss The Essay On Progressive Reform

July 29, 2021

Discuss the Essay on Progressive Reform

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Discuss the Essay on Progressive Reform.

1521th chapters

You’ll need a thesis statement as well as specific historical evidence to back it up. You can’t just say, “In the 1910s, there was violence against African Americans.” You’ll need proof to back up your claim. Take, for example, The Tulsa Riot, and describe it in detail. Give more than a list of individuals or events. You must describe who or what they were, as well as how they are related.

To cover it, you’ll need at least 2-3 double-spaced pages (1000 words).

Talk about Progressive Reform. The textbook can be found in Chapters 17 and 18 of the book.

This could be divided into two categories: social reform and political reform.

Take a look at the Progressives and their motivations.

Consider the Social Gospel, Settlement Houses (Hull House), Temperance (Frances Willard, WCTU), the Mann Act, Jack Johnson, Margaret Sanger, and other concerns about social purity.

Political: consider efficiency, municipal reform, labor regulations (especially in light of the Triangle Fire and efforts to combat child labor), “trust busting,” and government regulation (particularly in the meat packing industry and the Pure Food movement don’t forget the Jungle and the Poison Squad). Take a look at the muckrakers’ role. Political figures such as Theodore Roosevelt and others are well-known.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met