Discourse on the Noble Quest

Discourse on the Noble Quest

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

Discourse on the Noble Quest

INSTRUCTIONS:

 

For this assignment, you are to read a primary source related

to the content of the lecture in this module. Upon completion

of the reading, you will need to complete a reading response

journal. Reading response journals provide opportunities to

practice understanding and evaluation of philosophical

conceptions of the good life we consider in the course; these

opportunities, along with feedback received, will prepare you

for the analysis and evaluation component of the final

project.

 

After reading the “Discourse on the Noble Quest” reflect on

the ideas, arguments, conceptions, and perspectives offered.

Consider one of them that you find intriguing, compelling, or

important to your understanding of the reading. In doing so,

ponder the specific reasons for why you find it intriguing,

compelling, or important. Possible considerations to

contemplate is the strength of an argument in terms of its

validity, its truthfulness in terms of evidence that can

support it, its coherence with other ideas presented in the

reading, its relatability to your own life (especially the

specific values and beliefs you hold–not just a story about

how one time…), and how it compares with other

philosophical perspectives you have encountered elsewhere.

Be sure to explain the argument you choose, define philosophical concepts that you use, and provide examples

to support your points. Your explanation should include

textual support with citations; any citation style can be used

so long as the page number of the quote or paraphrase is

provided. To earn full credit and have appropriate

philosophical depth, your response should be at least 400

words.

 

READING: Discourse on the Noble Quest.pdf

 

GRADING POLICY:

 

There will be a total of 11 journal entries; the lowest score

will be dropped when calculating the final grade. This results

in 10 journal entries, each being worth 4% of the final grade.

6 entries will be graded as credit/no credit and 5 entries will

be graded according to the rubric. You will not know in

advance which entries will be graded credit/no credit and

which entries will be graded with the rubric; as such, entries should be completed with the expectation that the rubric could be used.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH

NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!