Discourse on the Noble Quest
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Discourse on the Noble Quest
INSTRUCTIONS:
For this assignment, you are to read a primary source related
to the content of the lecture in this module. Upon completion
of the reading, you will need to complete a reading response
journal. Reading response journals provide opportunities to
practice understanding and evaluation of philosophical
conceptions of the good life we consider in the course; these
opportunities, along with feedback received, will prepare you
for the analysis and evaluation component of the final
project.
After reading the “Discourse on the Noble Quest” reflect on
the ideas, arguments, conceptions, and perspectives offered.
Consider one of them that you find intriguing, compelling, or
important to your understanding of the reading. In doing so,
ponder the specific reasons for why you find it intriguing,
compelling, or important. Possible considerations to
contemplate is the strength of an argument in terms of its
validity, its truthfulness in terms of evidence that can
support it, its coherence with other ideas presented in the
reading, its relatability to your own life (especially the
specific values and beliefs you hold–not just a story about
how one time…), and how it compares with other
philosophical perspectives you have encountered elsewhere.
Be sure to explain the argument you choose, define philosophical concepts that you use, and provide examples
to support your points. Your explanation should include
textual support with citations; any citation style can be used
so long as the page number of the quote or paraphrase is
provided. To earn full credit and have appropriate
philosophical depth, your response should be at least 400
words.
READING: Discourse on the Noble Quest.pdf
GRADING POLICY:
There will be a total of 11 journal entries; the lowest score
will be dropped when calculating the final grade. This results
in 10 journal entries, each being worth 4% of the final grade.
6 entries will be graded as credit/no credit and 5 entries will
be graded according to the rubric. You will not know in
advance which entries will be graded credit/no credit and
which entries will be graded with the rubric; as such, entries should be completed with the expectation that the rubric could be used.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH
NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH