Dino Podcast Analysis the Love of Dinosaurs Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Dino Podcast Analysis the Love of Dinosaurs DiscussionHere are some additional tips for this assignment:There are many options for this assignment. Here is a compiled list of possible choices.You can of course choose another source, as long as the information is scientificallycorrect, and the source of the podcast/video is trusted.Podcast options: I Know Dino: https://iknowdino.com/; PastTime: http://www.pasttime.org; Palaeocast: http://www.palaeocast.com/; Palaeo AfterDark: http://palaeoafterdark.libsyn.com/; Sauropodcast: https://www.cmnh.org/sauropodcast; Science Friday: http://www.sciencefriday.com/; TetrapodZoology: http://www.tetzoo.com; Third Pod From theSUN https://thirdpodfromthesun.com/Video options: PBS Eons: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzR-rom72PHN9Zg7RML9EbA; Shelf Life: The American Museum of NaturalHistory: https://www.amnh.org/shelf-life; Specimen Spotlight: Cleveland Museum ofNatural History: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCMNH; The Brain Scoop: FieldMuseum of Natural History: https://www.youtube.com/user/thebrainscoop; The CuriosityShow: Natural History Museum of Los AngelesCounty: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI25TJt4mqXcNCIA_raMGKaqhOg5Yaq3TWhat is you podcast/video about? (3 sentence summary)Why did you choose your video/podcast? (include link to episode or video)List at least 5 new facts that you learnedIn what way did (or will) this podcast/video tie into something you’ve learned in lectureor lab?Did the video/podcast entertain you? Please provide at least 2 reasons that the videowas entertaining and communicated the science well, and 2 areas in which the videomaker/podcast hosts could improve.Carcinogens Asbestos Research PaperResearch a carcinogen that can be classified as either an environmental oroccupational toxicant that has had relevance in the news within the last five years.In your paper, analyze and briefly summarize the situation that brought the carcinogento newsworthy status. Discuss the exposure limits of this carcinogen, and howindividuals were exposed. Also, discuss the toxicological effects that were not onlyobserved, but all of the possible effects of this agent. In referencing Chapter 23 fromyour assigned reading, briefly discuss the models used for assessing cancer risks.Dino Podcast Analysis the Love of Dinosaurs Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Dino Podcast Analysis the Love of Dinosaurs Discussion
Dino Podcast Analysis the Love of Dinosaurs Discussion