Describe The Politics-Administration Dichotomy
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Describe The Politics-Administration Dichotomy
- Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate.
- Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why.
Use two to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.
SECOND EXAMINATION PHIL 1103, Summer
You must complete the examination in accordance with the Examination
Instructions (available under Content->Instructions). Examinations that do not comply with those instructions and all course formatting and submission
requirements will not be accepted. Be sure to give proper citations for all of your sources.
Be sure to answer each part of each question; it is best to include headings in your answer like “Question 1, Part 1” so that I can clearly see where you are addressing
each part of each question. Be sure to use the Instructor’s Notes to help you write your answers.
Question One
First describe four important differences between the Utilitarian moral perspective and Kant’s moral perspective. Second, describe a situation in which the Utilitarian and the Kantian moral perspectives result in opposing moral requirements.
Question Two
First describe four important differences between the Aristotelian virtue perspective and the Ethics of Care on moral questions. Second, describe a situation in which the Aristotle’s perspective and the Ethics of Care result in opposing moral requirements.
Question Three
First explain how Utilitarianism might conflict with Aristotle’s virtue perspective. Second, explain how Kant’s moral perspective might conflict with the Ethics of Care. Question Four
Ethical Hedonism is the view that one always ought to act so as to maximize their own personal pleasure. First explain why Utilitarianism, the Kantian perspective, Aristotle’s virtue perspective, and the Ethics of Care all disagree with Ethical Hedonism. Second, explain how each of those four perspectives can allow for personal pleasure to be important in the good life and moral decision-making.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Describe The Politics-Administration Dichotomy
Describe The Politics-Administration Dichotomy