Demonstrating effective critical analysis of the research materials

Demonstrating effective critical analysis of the research materials

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

Demonstrating effective critical analysis of the research materials

 

RES 7440.CLOWk1.6.22.18

Description: Choose a topic that you are very interested in and may want to do your dissertation research on. Find three dissertations that focus on that topic area. (Try to find dissertations that are of qualitative studies) For each, describe a) the problem that their study may help address; b) the approach that was used in the research design; and c) State the research question and sub questions. In a 1400-2100 word (or 4-6 page) paper, describe how are the problem, research question, and inquiry approach aligned in each study?

Total Possible Score: 10.00

Two dissertations appropriate to the topic are found and referenced

Total: 1.00

Both dissertations with appropriate topics found are qualitative studies

Both dissertations with appropriate topics are found

Only one dissertation is a qualitative study

Less than two appropriate dissertations are found

No appropriate dissertations are found

Problem statements from each dissertation are described

Total: 1.00

Two problem statements are found and described

Problem statements are found but not stated as problems

One problem statement is found and described

Neither problem statements are correctly reported

No problem statements are correctly reported

Inquiry approach used in each dissertation described

Total: 1.00

Methodological approach correctly described and eloquently explained for both dissertations

Methodological approach correctly described and explained for both dissertations

Methodological approach correctly described for both dissertations

Methodological approach correctly described for one of the dissertations

Methodological approaches not correctly described

Research Question and Sub questions for each dissertation are presented

Total: 1.00

Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented and eloquently explained

Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented and explained

Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented

Some research questions or subquestions are missing

All research questions and subquestions are missing

Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are described

Total: 2.00

Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are eloquently described

Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are adequately described

Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are described

Alignment is not accurately described.

Alignment not addressed.

Writing and Organization

Total: 2.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.

4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.

3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.

2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.

1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.

Research

Total: 2.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials.  The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials.  The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials.  The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH

NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!