Demonstrating effective critical analysis of the research materials
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Demonstrating effective critical analysis of the research materials
RES 7440.CLOWk1.6.22.18
Description: Choose a topic that you are very interested in and may want to do your dissertation research on. Find three dissertations that focus on that topic area. (Try to find dissertations that are of qualitative studies) For each, describe a) the problem that their study may help address; b) the approach that was used in the research design; and c) State the research question and sub questions. In a 1400-2100 word (or 4-6 page) paper, describe how are the problem, research question, and inquiry approach aligned in each study?
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Two dissertations appropriate to the topic are found and referenced
Total: 1.00
Both dissertations with appropriate topics found are qualitative studies
Both dissertations with appropriate topics are found
Only one dissertation is a qualitative study
Less than two appropriate dissertations are found
No appropriate dissertations are found
Problem statements from each dissertation are described
Total: 1.00
Two problem statements are found and described
Problem statements are found but not stated as problems
One problem statement is found and described
Neither problem statements are correctly reported
No problem statements are correctly reported
Inquiry approach used in each dissertation described
Total: 1.00
Methodological approach correctly described and eloquently explained for both dissertations
Methodological approach correctly described and explained for both dissertations
Methodological approach correctly described for both dissertations
Methodological approach correctly described for one of the dissertations
Methodological approaches not correctly described
Research Question and Sub questions for each dissertation are presented
Total: 1.00
Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented and eloquently explained
Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented and explained
Research questions and subquestions for each dissertation are presented
Some research questions or subquestions are missing
All research questions and subquestions are missing
Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are described
Total: 2.00
Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are eloquently described
Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are adequately described
Alignment of elements (problem, research question, and inquiry approach) in each dissertation are described
Alignment is not accurately described.
Alignment not addressed.
Writing and Organization
Total: 2.00
5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.
4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.
3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.
2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.
1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.
Research
Total: 2.00
5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials. The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials. The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials. The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH
NEW TEMPLATE OPTIMIZED RANK MATH