Defining Health: A Credible Exploration of Key Terms in Public Health
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
Defining Health: A Credible Exploration of Key Terms in Public Health”
This assignment requires the students to utilize credible sources, electronic or hard, to ‘discover’ definitions .
However, as part of the assignment, you will choose what sources you want to use!
Any source is applicable as long as it considered ‘credible’.
Students: Please plan on spending about twenty minutes per term locating, reading, and choosing what definitions to use for each of the terms, and then additional time correctly citing your source in APA style.
Again, part of the assignment requires you to locate credible sources for your definitions.
So what if you have never had to use a credible source for a research project before? Don’t worry!
Please contact a librarian or use an introduction to research site to learn what is considered a credible source.
Again, part of this assignment requires that you are going to be the person who determines what a credible source is!
Learning Activities
Begin By Creating A Page Titled, “Definitions’
Next, Complete These Five Activities:
1.) Define And Discuss The Term ‘Public’
Locate definitions from two credible sources, with one being a government source.
Cut and paste or retype the definitions word for word.
Cite each source using APA style
Provide a brief of your findings by discussing similarities and differences in a one to two sentence overview.
2.) Define And Discuss The Term ‘Health’,
Locate definitions from two credible sources, with one being a government source .
Cut and paste or retype the definitions word for word.
Cite each source using APA style
Provide a brief of your findings by discussing similarities and differences in a one to two sentence overview.
3.) Define And Discuss The Term ‘Public Health’
Locate definitions from two credible sources, with one being a government source.
Cut and paste or retype the definitions word for word.
Cite each source using APA style
Provide a brief of your findings by discussing similarities and differences in a one to two sentence overview.
4.) Define And Discuss The Term ‘Safety’
Locate definitions from two credible sources, with one being a government source.
Cut and paste or retype the definitions word for word.
Cite each source using APA style
Provide a brief of your findings by discussing similarities and differences in a one to two sentence overview.
5.) Define And Discuss The Terms:
A.) ‘Environmental Health’ and
B.) ‘Sanitation’
Locate definitions from two credible sources, with one being a government source.
Cut and paste or retype the definitions word for word.
Cite each source using APA style
Provide a brief of your findings by discussing similarities and differences in a one to two sentence overview.
- Instructional materials are determined by you, the student, for this assignment!
And remember, all sources must be credible and you must make that determination!
But here is a site from the University of Maryland to get you started:
https://sites.umuc.edu/library/libhow/credibility.cfm
Hint: Cut and paste this url!
As you can tell, I did not make it an easy click on link! This is on purpose! You are highly encouraged to explore and search on your own!Defining Health: A Credible Exploration of Key Terms in Public Health
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow