Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists Solution

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

Case Study One Worksheet

Dr. Eduardo Romaro, a clinically trained forensic psychologist, was retained by the

prosecution to evaluate the intellectual competence of John Stone, a 50-year-old

man convicted of first-degree murder of a guard during a bank robbery. John had

 

claimed he was innocent throughout the trial. In the state in which the trial was

 

conducted, individuals convicted of such an offense face the death penalty. John’s

 

attorney challenged the death penalty option for his client, claiming that the defendant

 

is intellectually disabled. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia

 

(2002) that the execution of those with intellectual disability (formerly known as

 

mental retardation) is unconstitutional. Dr. Romaro had worked with the prosecution

 

before on intellectual disability cases, but this is the first time he had been

 

retained for a capital punishment case. He is personally ambivalent about whether

states should implement the death penalty.

 

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

 

The psychologist meets John in a private room in the prison and administers a

 

battery of intellectual and adaptive behavior tests with proven psychometric validity

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

for determining forensically relevant intellectual ability. Just as he ends the formal

 

test administration, John becomes distraught and appears to be experiencing

 

an anxiety attack. In his distress the psychologist hears the prisoner repeatedly

asking God for forgiveness for killing the guard and for murdering another person,

 

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

who he keeps calling “the boy waiting for the bus.” The psychologist shifts into an

emergency crisis intervention mode to help calm the defendant and rings for assistance.

Dr. Romaro was shocked to hear John “confess” not only to the bank murder

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

but also to the murder of a “boy waiting for a bus.”

 

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition

 

(DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of intellectual disability (currently termed “mental retardation

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

developmental disability”) requires that individuals demonstrate significantly

 

sub-average intellectual functioning, impairments in adaptive functioning,

 

and onset before 18 years of age. Similarly, the state standard for intellectual disability

includes a developmental history of intellectual impairment. Prior to testing,

 

FOR THE USE OF UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX STUDENTS AND FACULTY ONLY.

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SALE, OR REPRINTING.

 

ANY AND ALL UNAUTHORIZED USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

 

Copyright © 2013 by SAGE Publications, Inc.

Appendix B——355

Dr. Romaro had asked the prosecutor for all available childhood mental health or

 

school records to determine if John meets these criteria. No formal educational

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

or psychological evaluations were included in the materials he received. The

 

records indicated that John had a poor academic record, was retained in fifth

 

grade, was suspended several times for coming to school drunk, and had left

 

school when he was 15. State criteria also include an IQ score less than 70 and

 

poor adaptive skills.

 

That evening Dr. Romaro scores the test battery. John’s IQ score is 71, his performance

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

on other cognitive tests fell close to the intellectual disability cutoff score

(some above, some below). His adaptive functioning score is a standard deviation

 

below average. However, given the prisoner’s age, without a more detailed set of

 

childhood records, it is difficult to clearly conclude that he meets the DSM-IV-TR

 

or state legal criteria for intellectual disability. Dr. Romaro had not been asked to

 

administer assessments for mood, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders that

might impair intellectual and adaptive performance.

 

Ethical Dilemma

Dr. Romaro is not sure what forensic opinion to give regarding whether or not

 

John meets the legal criteria for intellectual disability. Without evidence of intellectual

 

disability in his youth, a diagnosis of intellectual disability may not be possible

 

and, thus, could not be used to support John’s death penalty appeal. He is also

 

unsure whether he has an ethical responsibility to include in his report John’s

“confession” or John’s statement about the “boy waiting for a bus.”

 

Respond to the following questions in 300 words each question

 

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

 

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

2. How might Dr. Romaro’s ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might John’s “confession” or his comment about the “boy waiting for the bus” influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaro’s report?

 

3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05, 5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

 

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

http://www.apa.org/ethics/

 

4. What steps should Dr. Romaro take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effect?

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

Reference

http://www.apa.org/ethics/

 

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

Decoding the Ethics Code for Psychologists

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!