CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies
Lab Activity #3: Investigate System Backup and Restore Tools
- Assess and document the use of a system backup tool or disk imaging utility to create a “known-good” copy of the system hard drive for a Windows 8.1 Workstation.
- Assess and document the use of “known-good” copies of system hard drives to restore system availability after an incident. CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies
Overview:
For this activity, we will focus upon assessing and documenting tools which are used in the preparation phase and in the containment, eradication, and recovery phase of the Incident Response Process (as defined in NIST SP
800-61r2). These tools will support incident responders by providing “access to images of clean OS and application installations for restoration and recovery purposes” (Cichonski, Millar, Grance, & Scarfone, 2012, p. 23).
Situation Report:
Recent contracts with the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security have imposed additional security requirements upon the company and its SCADA lab operations. The company is now required to comply with NIST
Special Publication 800-171 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations. The company must also comply with provisions of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations
(DFARS) including section 252-204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting. These requirements are designed to ensure that sensitive technical information, provided by the federal
government and stored on computer systems in the Sifers-Grayson SCADA lab, is protected from unauthorized disclosure. This information includes software designs and source code for Industrial Control Systems for which
Sifers-Grayson is providing software support and maintenance. The contract requirements also mandate that Sifers-Grayson report cyber incidents to the federal government in a timely manner. CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies
The engineering and design workstations in the Sifers-Grayson SCADA Lab were upgraded from Windows XP to Windows 8.1 professional three years ago after the lab was hit with a ransomware attack that exploited several
Windows XP vulnerabilities. A second successful ransomware attack occurred three months ago. The company paid the ransom in both cases because the lab did not have file backups that it could use to recover the damaged
files (in the first case) and did not have system backups that it could use to rebuild the system hard drives (in the second case).
The SCADA Lab is locked into using Windows 8.1. The planned transition to Windows 10 is on indefinite hold due to technical problems encountered during previous attempts to modify required software applications to work
under the new version of the operating system. This means that an incident response and recovery capability for the lab must support the Windows 8.1 operating system and the related engineering software applications. But,
the customer’s technical representatives have strongly suggested that Sifers-Grayson personnel use backup utilities that are not specific to the Windows 8.1 operating system.
Reference
Cichonski, P., Millar, T., Grance, T., & Scarfone, K. (2012). Computer security incident handling guide (NIST SP 800-62 rev. 2). http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-61r2
Your Task
Prepare draft incident response guidance to be included in the Sifers-Grayson Incident Responder’s Handbook. Your draft guidance will explain the use of a commercially available system hard drive backup tool. Your guidance will explain how to use your selected third-party tool to create either a system backup or a system image (bit for bit copy) of the system hard drive for a Windows 8.1 workstation. Suggested tools include: Acronis, FTK Imager, and Paladin.
You will create two separate procedures. The first will explain how to perform a backup. The second will explain how to use the known-good backup to restore the system hard drive (also, how to restore to a new hard drive). Both procedures must address the use of cryptographic hash codes (e.g. MD5 or SHA-256) to verify the integrity of the backup files and/or system image files.
Instructions
Part (a): Creating a “Known-Good” (Clean) Backup for a System Disk for a Windows 8.1 Workstation
- Using the Internet, research commercially available system backup tool or application. (Do not use any features or utilities that are part of the Windows operating system.) Then, identify appropriate sources of information and instructions for your selected tool. Using those sources, research the procedures required to
- Create a “known good” copy (system backup or complete system image) of the hard drive containing the Windows 8.1 system and installed applications for a workstation in the SCADA lab.
- Generate a hash code for use in verifying the validity and integrity of the backup file or system image file. (If your backup utility does not provide this, you will need to find a separate tool that will generate an MD-5 or SHA-256 hash value for the image file or backup file. See https://www.howtogeek.com/67241/htg-explains-what-are-md5-sha-1-hashes-and-how-do-i-check-them/for an explanation of file integrity checking using hash codes.)
- You should also research and document best practices for labeling and storing the digital media containing the backup files and/or system image files. The storage location should provide secure storage yet be readily available to incident responders in the event of an incident. The label or storage log should include the hash value for each backup file and system image file.
- Identify how the backup tool could be used during the preparation phaseof the incident response and recovery process. Typical uses include:
- Create a “known good” backup that contains a complete, verified and approved system configuration that includes the operating system and all required application software.
- Create a copy of the original operating system installation (before software applications are installed).
- Write a guidance document that identifies the tool, explains the capabilities it provides, and then lists and briefly describes the recommended uses identified under item #2. Add a list of resources that can be consulted for additional information. Next, summarize the procedures required to perform the tasks listed under item #1 (do not provide step-by-step instructions). Close your guidance document with a Notes / Warnings / Restrictions section that answers the question “Is there anything else the incident responder needs to be aware of when using this tool?”
Part (b): Using a “Known-Good” (Clean) Backup to Restore a System Disk for a Windows 8.1 Workstation
- Use the same tool and tool research as performed for part (a) of this lab. If necessary, identify additional sources of information and instructions for using your selected tool(s) to perform the following tasks:
- Verify the validity of the backup image or file (using the hash code).
- Use the “known good” copy (system backup or system image) to rebuild a workstation hard drive so that it contains the Windows 8.1 operation system and installed applications.
- Identify how the tool could be used during the containment, eradication & recovery phaseof the incident response and recovery process. Typical uses include:
- Restore workstation hard drives to a “known good” configuration.
- Build a new system disk using a replacement or newly purchased hard drive.
- Restore the system to full operating status after an attack or suspected attack.
- Write a guidance document that identifies the tool, explains the capabilities it provides, and then lists and briefly describes the recommended uses identified under item #2. Add a list of resources that can be consulted for additional information. Next, summarize the procedures required to perform the tasks listed under item #1 (do not provide step-by-step instructions). Close your guidance document with a Notes / Warnings / Restrictions section that answers the question “Is there anything else the incident responder needs to be aware of when using this tool?”
Finalize Your Deliverable
- Using the grading rubric as a guide, refine your incident response guidance. Your final products should be suitable for inclusion in the organization’s Incident Responder’s Handbook. Remember that, even though you are submitting your work in a single file, you are preparing stand-alone guidance documents. FOLLOW THE TEMPLATE.
- As appropriate, cite your sources using footnotes or another appropriate citation style.
- Use the resources section to provide information about recommended readings and any sources that you cite. Use a standard bibliographic format (you may wish to use APA since this is required in other CSIA courses). Information about sources and recommended readings, including in-text citations, should be formatted consistently and professionally.
- Your submission file for this assignment should start with a title page which lists the following information:
- Lab Title and Number
- Date
- Your Name
- Use the required template file: CSIA 310 Template for Lab Deliverable.docxThis file is set up to provide the required title page and two incident response guidancedocuments. Use the first template for your “Creating a Clean Backup of a System Disk” guidance. Use the second procedure template for your “Using a Clean Backup to Restore a System Disk” guidance.
Copyright ©2018 by University of Maryland University College. All Rights Reserved.
CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
CSIA 310: Cybersecurity Processes and Technologies