Coronavirus Impact Discussion

Coronavirus Impact Discussion

Instructions

Coronavirus Impact Discussion

Purpose: The purpose of the final paper is to provide students an opportunity to explore the impact of health communication during the present Coronavirus pandemic. In other words, to apply what we learned during this week’s unit to what is going on in the world around us.

Prompt: This is a reflection paper highlighting how communication surrounding the coronavirus impacted the decisions you made these last 2.5 years regarding your perceptions and behaviors. In other words, how has the messaging surrounding the coronavirus impacted your decision making? Topics can include, but are not limited to, mask wearing, social distancing, stay at home orders, holiday travel, vaccines, and the reality of the pandemic (which is real, but not all messaging acknowledged that). Your reflection should take on at least two topics. For each topic, describe the messaging and briefly explore how it impacted your decision making. Messaging could include board or specific virtual conversations, a specific piece of communication (e.g., tweet, journal article, news story), communication from a particular source, interpersonal communication, etc. Each topic should have its own communication messaging example.

Because communication is all around us all the time, make sure it is very clear in your paper–to the reader who is your grader–what specific and tangible moments of communication on which you are reflecting. If the reader (i.e., grader) has to guess what specific communication moment(s) you are reflecting on, that will be reflected in your grade.

Citing: If you choose to reference a specific communication moment (e.g., tweet, journal article, news story) then you need to cite that moment and include a reference list. If you refer to communication generally on a macro-level, a reference list is not necessary. For example, the following statements would not need a citation:

“On Instagram, my newsfeed showed as many pro-vaccine posts as it did anti-vaccines posts.”

“At our Thanksgiving dinner table, my family members were arguing both the pros and cons of the mask wearing mandate.”

On the other hand, the following statements would need to be cited:

“When CNN reported that deaths related to the Coronavirus had surpassed a quarter million, I really started to get vocal about my support for mask wearing.”

“When I saw Donald Trump’s tweet comparing the virus to the flu, I felt like this virus was not that serious.”

Coronavirus Impact Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!