Contract Analysis Residential House Lease Case Study

Contract Analysis Residential House Lease Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Contract Analysis Residential House Lease Case Study

See the grading rubric for scoring. Support your answers with law from your text (cases; statutes) and properly cite that law, including the page number. State your legal argument in IRAC format (identify the Issue; then state the applicable Rule(s); Apply the facts to the rule; then state a Conclusion).

Residential House Lease

The following questions are based on the Residential House Lease found in the Contracts Module. Please reference the Lease by clause number as you answer the question

Essays (2-3 complete paragraphs per question with text references to support your answers)

1) Maria, the landlord, refuses to fix a small leak in the roof that results in mold forming in the premises. Juan, the tenant, still has significant time remaining on his lease. Juan has notified Maria in writing of the mold and leak issue. What are Juan’s options if Maria declines to do the repairs?

2) Shortly after moving in but with significant time remaining on the lease, Bill, the tenant, finds a much better apartment for the same price. Bill notifies Zuzanne, the Landlord, that he is moving out immediately and signs a new lease for the new apartment. What recourse does Zuzanne have against Bill?

UCC Sales Contract

The following questions are based on the Sales Contract found in the Contracts Module. Please reference the Sales Contract by clause number as you answer the questions.

Essays (2-3 complete paragraphs per essay with text references to support your answers)

UCC Sales Contract The following question is based on the Sales Contract found in the Contracts Module. Please reference the Sales Contract by clause number as you answer the questions. Remember, this is a contract under the UCC. You contend that you received non-conforming goods as a result of an ambiguity in the contract. You ordered goods thinking you would get a particular product. You wanted Razor scooters. That was the original oral communication when you first contacted the selling merchant. You both talked about and agreed on Razor scooters. Thereafter, in phone conversations, you and the seller just used the phrase scooters. The seller prepared a written contract. The contract was signed by both parties. The selling merchant then shipped scooters that are in perfect condition but they are not Razor scooters. The selling merchant believes the goods are conforming.

3) Upon immediate receipt and inspection of the goods, what are all your merchant options under the contract and at law?

4) Under this scenario, you discover an employee signed for the receipt of the scooters over (90) days ago and they have just been sitting in a warehouse. What are your options now as the Buyer pursuant to the contract?

Rubric

Contract Analysis – Part 1

Contract Analysis – Part 1
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLease 1 – Substance of essay	6.0 pts Full Marks 5.0 pts Needs further development 4.0 pts Needs more legal argument supported by law; less opinion 3.0 pts All opinion; no legal argument 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLease 2 – Substance of essay	6.0 pts Full Marks 5.0 pts Needs further development 4.0 pts Needs more legal argument supported by law; less opinion 3.0 pts All opinion; no legal argument 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContract 1 – Substance of essay	6.0 pts Full Marks 5.0 pts Needs further development 4.0 pts Needs more legal argument supported by law; less opinion 3.0 pts All opinion; no legal argument 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContract 2 – Substance of essay	6.0 pts Full Marks 5.0 pts Needs further development 4.0 pts Needs more legal argument supported by law; less opinion 3.0 pts All opinion; no legal argument 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText Reference	4.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling / Grammar	5.0 pts Full Marks 4.0 pts Minor errors 3.0 pts Significant errors 0.0 pts No Marks	5.0 pts
Total Points: 33.0

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Contract Analysis Residential House Lease Case Study

Contract Analysis Residential House Lease Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!