Computer Crime Discussion

Computer Crime Discussion

Instructions

Computer Crime Discussion

Write a 8-12 page paper discussing the below topics as they relate to computer crime.

Submission Instructions:

You must provide cases and examples to support the topics.

1) Identify and discuss the steps necessary to make electronic evidence admissible in court.

2) Identify various crimes and incidents that are involved in electronic forensic investigations.

3) Discuss the importance of security and computer use policies.

4) Identify and discuss the techniques to obtain evidence from Internet and Web resources.

5) Identify and discuss the types of evidence that can be recovered from computer and electronic devices.

6) Discuss the importance of documentation and chain-of-custody in the forensic process.

Submit your Term Paper in a Word file for grading.

Specific Instructions for the Term Paper:

Include a title page for your own paper. This includes the “Running Head” in the page header, the title of your paper, and your name. Also add the university and class info as well as the date authoring the paper.

Write a 150-250 word abstract for your the paper (on p. 2 of the Term Paper). The abstract should be a brief summary of your paper.

Next you need a Table of contents page.

Next you will start the paper. The 8-12 page starts counting from this page. All prior pages are pages for “metadata” information about the paper – and not part of the body of the paper.

Computer Crime Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!