Completing The FWT Column For Payroll Register 1

February 15, 2022

Completing the FWT Column for Payroll Register

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Completing the FWT Column for Payroll Register

Question Description

Complete the FWT column (wage-bracket method) and SWT column of the payroll register using the employee data listed below. The associated pay period ends on 09/08/2019 (enter the year using four digits), with paychecks being printed and distributed six days later. Every employee earns hourly overtime wages 1.5 times greater than their regular wage rate.

Enter all employees’ names in the format Last Name, First Initial (for example Rick Smith would be written as Smith, R). The state income tax withholding rate is 5.0% of taxable pay, with taxable pay being the same for federal and state income tax withholding. Note that the Voluntary Withholding column, for which partial information is provided below, has been populated based on the partial information shown here.
Jonathan Olsen earns $9.10/hour and worked 47 hours during the most recent week. He participates in a cafeteria plan, to which he pays $100 each period. Jonathan Olsen is single, claims two federal withholding allowances, and one state withholding allowance.

Completing the FWT Column for Payroll Register

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met