Communications Memorandum

Communications Memorandum

Instructions

Communications Memorandum

Week 04/05: Send your memo draft to your parter and CC me by the end of week 4. Send your peer-review answers to your parter (and CC me) by Saturday of week 5.

Week 08/09: Send your memo draft to your parter and CC me by the end of week 8. Send your peer-review answers to your parter (and CC me) by Saturday of week 9.

Each of 2 rounds of peer review are worth 5 points, so overall the peer reviews will be up to 10 out of 200 points, which is 5% of the final grade.

Introduction

While drafting the 1st and 3rd stages of your memo that critically examines a moral problem in the workplace, you will receive input from a peer classmate, and in turn, you will provide input to him/her. This peer review process will take place over two weeks for each stage of your memo:

Directions

Following are the instructions for this assignment:

1. By the end of the first week, do the following:
   1. Draft the stage of your memo. Spend the bulk of your time on your draft rather than the revised version that you submit to your instructor. In other words, make your draft as well-thought-out as possible.
   2. Go to the Sorting Hat and look for the peer to whom your instructor has assigned you.
   3. Email your partner your paper by 11:59pm on Tuesday.
2. By Saturday of the second week, do the following:
   1. Review your peer’s memo. Do not edit it, in other words, do not post a document with tracked changes or comments. Instead, focus on the substance. Specifically, create a Word document, and write out each of the following questions and your answer to it:1) How sufficient are the answers to the questions?
      2) What facts might be missing? What are their sources?
      3) What values might be missing? What are their sources?
      4) What areas might be confusing?

      Thus, your Word document should contain the aforementioned four questions and their four answers. If you suggest changes, explain them as clearly as possible. If you are answering a question (e.g., regarding sufficiency) and find you have no suggested changes, give at least one example of how it is exemplary.

   2. Email your Word document with your answers to the aforementioned questions to your partner and CC me.
   3. Receive your peer’s comments on your memo, use them to revise your memo as you see fit, and submit the revision to your instructor, by the end of the week.

Scoring

You can earn up to 5 points for each peer review. Follow all of the instructions, ensuring your answers to the questions (a) strengthen your peer’s analysis (3 points) and (b) avoid vague statements while defining terms (2 points). If you fail to submit your draft memo or comments to your peer by the deadlines, you will receive an automatic 0 for this assignment.

Communications Memorandum

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!