Communications Human Relations Paper

Communications Human Relations Paper

Instructions

Communications Human Relations Paper

This week I learned that “Self-disclosure” is a key ingredient in building trust with others in a healthy way. once I read “Self-disclosure also helps with building relationships. When individuals exchange personal information, they learn more about each other and become more comfortable with each other.” (DeVito, 1989, p.127). I immediately went deep into my own mind and recalled countless of moments in which my communication was flawed. I see many of my mistakes in the past being solved by building a healthier foundation of trust first.

In the workplace there will be times when you will be asked to do things are not enjoyable. I constantly remind myself that when I’m at work, that if I’m not being paid to give my constructive input in then I keep my thoughts to myself. Whenever I get into any kind of communication disagreement, I find myself in is defused with reexplanations. As long as there is a understanding before every work day that my opinion mostly does not matter there are fewer disagreements. If I were ever emotional in the workplace it would be provoked by a tramatic event on a large scale, which at that point I would take the day off.

Communications Human Relations Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!