COMM 410 Third Party Intervention Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
COMM 410 Third Party Intervention Discussion
Choose two of the scenarios, listed below:
- Your roommate stops paying her share of the rent.
- A friend keeps using your clothes without permission
- Your sister won’t pick up or return calls or texts. She made bitter comments the last time you were together and you can’t get to her to try to make things right.
- You and your romantic partner are separating but neither of you say you want to.
- You are a teacher and you see your elementary school-age students fighting during recess.
- Your workgroup stops meeting and team members do not reply to e-mails.
- An employee is injured on the job and wants health benefits.
- Your younger brother or sister tells you that one of their friends is being harassed and sexually bullied.
- Two ranchers in your community have an ongoing dispute over water rights, and it is affecting the entire community.
- For each scenario, identify a specific type of formal or informal third-party intervention(e.g. coaching, counseling, mediation, etc.) that you believe would be most effective in helping the party or parties effectively manage the conflict.
- Explain why you chose this mode of intervention: Why do you think it will be the most effective choice in this situation?
- What are the possible disadvantages of the type of intervention you chose?
- What cautions should you remember whenever you are considering becoming a third-party helper?
COMM 410 Third Party Intervention Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Table of Contents