Christian University Social Science Paper

Christian University Social Science Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Christian University Social Science Paper

Description

Critical Thinking Assignment (90 Points) Important! Read First Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission. Option #1: Identifying Research Causation, Experiments, & Internal and External Validity The Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) is a well-known program.

However, there is no scientific evidence that proves its effectiveness. Create a presentation in PowerPoint describing an experimental design, testing the hypothesis that D.A.R.E. reduces drug use. Is your design feasible? Make sure that you are considering the elements of a classical experimental design, and internal and external validity issues. Your PowerPoint presentation needs to be 8-10 slides in length (not counting the cover and references slides) and comply with the CSU-Global APA Style Guide Requirements (Links to an external site.). Option #2: Validity Threats and Experimental Design Crime hot-spots are places where crime is prevailing.

Police departments with competent resources can identify these spots and create useful strategies to minimize crime in those affected areas. In your paper, address the following: In studying the effects of police interference on crime hot-spots, what types of validity threats researchers would investigate?

By taking into consideration the components of a classical experimental design, how would you construct a study to investigate this? Your paper must be concise, well written, and should meet the following: Length: 2-3 pages (not counting cover and references pages).

To support your statements, cite a minimum of 2 scholarly journal sources that are not provided or linked in this course. The CSU-Global Campus Library (Links to an external site.) database is very useful to find this type of scholarly sources. Formatted in compliance with the CSU-Global APA Style Guide Requirements (Links to an external site.). Rubric

Christian University Social Science Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Christian University Social Science Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!