|Assignment ID Number||AFFGEHU83939HD|
|Type of Document||Essay|
|Number of Pages||10 Pages|
Answer the following questions after watching the Childrens Advocacy Center child interview (“Tammy”).
Based on the age of the child, what types of questions should the child be able to answer?
Throughout the interview, Tammy tells idiosyncratic things that increases her credibility. Name some of the details she shared.
Evaluate the interviewers demeanor. Does she show any bias? Was her demeanor consistent, or did it change throughout the interview?
Evaluate the interviewers questions. Were there questions she asked that Tammy couldnt understand? When Tammy appeared unsure of answering certain questions, what did the interviewer say or do? Was the interviewer detailed?
Based on the information gathered from the interview, how might the multidisciplinary team proceed with the investigation?
Your paper should be 1 – 2 pages in length, in APA format, and free of grammatical errors.
|Criteria||0 – 1 Points||2 – 3 Point||4 – 5 Points||Total|
|Professional communication||Unprofessional communication; many errors; no APA||Minor grammar, spelling, and APA errors||Postings are professional and in standard written English with APA|
|Complete addressing of assessment criteria||Criteria not fully addressed||Minimal response to criteria; minor aspects missing||All criteria are fully addressed|
|Evidence of critical thinking or extending information||Critical thinking or extending information not evident||Obvious responses to questions; little thought evident||Posts demonstrate critical thinking with evidence base from research or experience|
|Course connections.||No connections provided||Minimal connections provided to readings/activities||Clear connections to readings/activities|
|Submitted an overview / summary of the case selected for analysis. Also identified those procedural steps to be analyzed.||Did not provide an adequate overview or summary of the selected case or failed to identify those steps to be analyzed.||Provides an adequate overview or summary of the selected case and steps to be analyzed though may not be clear or complete.||Case overview is clearly presented including all appropriate investigative steps to be analyzed.|