CBT Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral therapy Paper

CBT Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral therapy Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

CBT Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral therapy Paper

CBT ,Mindfulness, Cognitive, Behavioral, therapy, Paper

 

For the purpose of this assessment you are required to research ONE of the following therapies;

• Mindfulness OR

 

• Cognitive Behavioral therapy OR

 

• Motivational Interviewing

Following your research, you are required to discuss and display (tell me about your chosen topic) your learnt knowledge (i.e. what do you now know that you didn’t prior to the assessment task) presented in Essay format (Introduction, body and conclusion)  you are to support this knowledge with appropriate academic references (peer reviewed journals, text books not web pages/sites and definitely not Wikipedia) in APA format.

The required length of this assessment is 1000 words including your intext referencing however excluding your reference list.  You can use headings (Introduction, body and conclusion) to keep you on track. Please remember to use a cover page as per University assessment requirements.

Rubric

Therapeutic Interventions Essay

Therapeutic Interventions Essay
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIntroduction Introduction (remember the word count for this assignment is 1000 words in total, your introduction will need to be concise and yet informative. Include in-text citations where necessary)	10.0 Pts Full marks 0.0 Pts No marks	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBody/Discussion Demonstrates and applies knowledge and understanding of:  – Discuss an overview of the chosen therapeutic intervention  – The chosen therapeutic intervention and how it is applicable in the clinical setting with support from contemporary evidence (within 2010-2020) . – Discusses in detail what has been learnt about the chosen intervention   – Uses APA referencing to support discussion (a minimum of 10 references)	30.0 Pts Full marks 0.0 Pts No marks	30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion and Academic requirements Displays an ability to Draw some concluding points from your discussion. Uses scholarly principles of using evidence to inform writing, and academic integrity, include in text citations drawing on relevant peer reviewed evidence in the published literature to support your ideas and claims. Structure and present your work using academic writing conventions. Utilises APA referencing throughout essay	10.0 Pts Full marks 0.0 Pts No marks	10.0 pts

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

CBT Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral therapy Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!