Case studyMonarchy Government System Case Study

Monarchy Government System Case Study

Instructions

Monarchy Government System Case Study

After Franco’s death, Spain transitioned to a constitutional monarchy government system with King Juan Carlos I as the head of state. This transition was a deliberate attempt to move away from the authoritarian rule that characterized Franco’s regime and towards a more democratic form of government. One reason why a monarchy was chosen as the new form of government was that it provided a sense of continuity with Spain’s historical traditions. The monarchy has a long history in Spain, and many Spaniards saw the monarchy as a unifying force that could help to heal the divisions caused by Franco’s regime. Additionally, a constitutional monarchy provided a way to balance the need for stability and continuity with the desire for democratic reform. By vesting ultimate authority in the hands of an unelected monarch, the new government could avoid the instability and chaos that can sometimes arise when a country makes a sudden transition to democracy. However, it is worth noting that not everyone in Spain supported the monarchy as the best form of government for the transition to democracy. Some critics argued that a republic would have been a more democratic choice, as it would have provided a more direct link between the people and their government. Others argued that the monarchy was a symbol of the old order and was therefore incompatible with the newly democratic Spain. Overall, whether the monarchy was the best form of government for Spain’s transition to democracy is a matter of debate. However, it is clear that the decision to establish a constitutional monarchy helped to stabilize the country and pave the way for the development of a more democratic society.

Race, Power, Resistance

Write a sustained engagement with a topic related to the central themes of the class.

Your final paper should be 2,000–3,000 words, on a topic related to the central themes of the class. It should be organized around a central argument and all parts of the paper should work to support the central argument. It should have a clear structure, with an identifiable thesis, arguments, and conclusion.

Your paper should substantively engage (at least) one of the following texts we read in class: The Racial Contract (Mills), “The Emergency Manager” (Stanley), Visible Identities (Alcoff), the Combahee River Collective Statement, Seeing Like an Activist (Pineda). It can be an exegetical paper, or it can use one of these texts as a framework, or to motivate a focus on a certain problem, or it could extend an analysis or framework given by one of these texts, or perhaps some other sort of engagement. But it must engage that text in a substantive manner.

Your paper should engage (at least) one outside source that we did not engage in class. This source should be encountered in the course of careful research. (Your research should not be limited to a google search: use the library resources.) If the source is used to support claims of fact, it should be reliable. If the source is used as an example, it should be relevant. It could be, for example: a map from American Panorama other than the redlining map we engaged in class; the remaining parts of The Racial Contract, Visible Identities, or Seeing Like an Activist (we have library e-book access to each of these in their entirety); a source cited by one of the sources we engaged in class; or something else! (You may, of course, engage with the historical sources we engaged in class, but you must engage an outside source as well.)

All claims should be well-supported. Quotation (or other direct engagement, in the case of, e.g., maps) of the text(s) from class and the outside source(s) is expected.

Please avoid mistakes in the “Common Mistakes in Philosophical Writing” handout, and be cognizant of mistakes you made last time. Please remember that all citational information for assigned material is listed in the syllabus. Write in Deep Dives, so that you can take account of the writing feedback that it gives you in real time.

Please keep in mind the two rubric areas or instructor comments you identified in the proposal as areas you would improve on.

Monarchy Government System Case Study

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!