Capital Punishment Discussion solution

Capital Punishment Discussion

Table of Contents

Toggle

Instructions

Capital Punishment Discussion

Description

PHL-282: Ethics

Resources

• Textbook: Moral choices: An introduction to ethics

Instructions

1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
2. Read pages 247-269 in Moral Choices, a chapter discussing the ethical issues relating to capital punishment (execution of criminals).
3. Respond to the following questions:
   1. How might a person be holding a Kantian ethical philosophy view of capital punishment? (Again, remember that two people holding Kantian ethics might reach two different opinions on this question.)
   2. Based on your current ethical reasoning, how do you view the morality of capital punishment? What is the rationale behind your position? How do your views (and the reasoning behind them) compare and contrast with a person holding Kantian ethics.
   3. How do we recognize the best ethical position on capital punishment?
4. Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
5. Read and respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts, as well as all instructor follow-up questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
6. Your postings should also:
   1. Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
   2. Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
   3. Provide clarification to classmates’ questions and insight into the discussion.
7. You can also access the discussion forum by using the Activities button.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!