Business Process Discussion

Business Process Discussion

Instructions

Business Process Discussion

Discussion question at least 300 characters and the diagram can be added at the bottom of the discussion question..

For this discussion forum, you will be using Microsoft PowerPoint to develop a BPM diagram.  Referring to Figure 4-16 in Chapter 4 of your text, your diagram will  have two horizontal flow charts. The top flow chart represents the  existing consumer business process flow for paying health-related bills  currently at THS. The bottom flow chart, which should be located on the same PowerPoint slide, represents your suggested new process for a  consumer of the THS and will be utilizing the mobile consumer app to pay  bills online.

In your initial discussion post, attach your single  PowerPoint slide artifact with your BPM diagram. In 300 to 350 words,  compare the systems that the consumer uses today to pay bills  traditionally with the proposed bill pay online to be available in the  web platform. What are the process and technology differences and  similarities between paying bills today and proposed use of a mobile  application to pay health system bills? Name one user design best  practice described in the required scholarly articles this week. How  would you apply this principle to the consumer mobile application for  THS?

Business Process Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!