Budget Or Spending Proposal’s Main Conclusions

Budget Or Spending Proposal’s Main Conclusions

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Budget Or Spending Proposal’s Main Conclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title

Learners Name

Capella University

 

Executive Summary

Proposal Name:

Proposal Author:

Proposal Client:

Proposal Stakeholders:

Proposal Due Date:

Objectives:

Write an analysis that is one paragraph; describing the problem including any critical background information.

 

Write an analysis that is one paragraph; describing the proposed solution and provide a rationale.

 

Final Deliverable:

Write one paragraph with a brief a description of the budget or spending proposal’s main conclusions.

 

Risks:

Just show the major risks here. (This can be a bulleted list)

 

Project Budget / Spending Estimate:

Provide the totals of the budget or spending that will be necessary. If there is no budget or spending determined or necessary include a short statement of why.

 

Proposal Priorities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proposal

Proposed Guidelines

Write research-based guidelines for fair public debates and media coverage.

Use subheadings to organize content.

Use bullet points and phrases for main points, in addition to short, succinct paragraphs.

Include a visual, such as a graph, table, or chart to succinctly convey information, if you choose.

 

Guidelines for Fair Public Debate

Integrate principles of social psychology and research to develop guidelines for fair public debate.

Consider the following guiding questions as you develop the guidelines.

How does the format affect voter perception?

How can a moderator influence voter perception?

How can social and mainstream media be managed in a debate for balance? Consider the implications of visuals and voter perception.

What participant behaviors would you prohibit?

How do you propose to manage the behavior of the audience?

References

Support positions with references from scholarly and professional literature.

Support each guideline with at least one reference using APA format and style.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

List References (Left justified)

Line 2 (indented)

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Budget Or Spending Proposal’s Main Conclusions

Budget Or Spending Proposal’s Main Conclusions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!