BLS 111 Punishment for Wrong Use of a Weapon Discussion

BLS 111 Punishment for Wrong Use of a Weapon Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BLS 111 Punishment for Wrong Use of a Weapon Discussion

New Zork State recently passed a statute called the Weapon Crime Enhancement Bill (WCE). The WCE was passed after very detailed discussions and debates in the State Legislature regarding the increased use of weapons during the commission of a crime. The Legislators expressed an interest in attempting to deter the use of weapons by increasing the penalty if a person is convicted of an underlying crime in which a weapon was used. The text of the WCE reads as follows….”Any person convicted of a Felony or Misdemeanor in which the commission of the Felony or Misdemeanor included the use of a weapon, the definition of such weapon to include any knife over four inches long or any gun which is capable of discharging a bullet or bullet like substance, shall have the penalty of the underlying crime doubled because of the use of the weapon in conducting the crime.” The Facts….Darryl Drug set up a meeting with Seth Seller. Drug was to purchase 15 pounds of Crack Cocaine from Seller for an amount of 2000 dollars per pound. The meeting took place at the scheduled time and place. Drug only had 20000 dollars on him at the time of the meeting. The total deal required 30000 dollars. Seller informed Drug that Drug still owed Seller the amount of 10000 dollars. Drug left the room and went outside to his car. Drug returned to the meeting room with a Z62 Uzzi Automatic Machine Gun. Drug said to Seller, “Will you take this really cool gun for the 10000 dollars that I still owe you?” Seller said, “Yes,” took the gun and the 20000 dollars from Drug – then showed Drug his Police Badge and arrested Drug. Seth Seller is an undercover FBI Agent and the meeting was a “sting” operation. Drug was convicted of an illegal drug transaction, drug possession, and found guilty of a Felony drug crime. The usual penalty of 10 years for the underlying crime was doubled to 20 years pursuant to the WCE because a weapon was used in conducting the crime. Drug challenges the doubling of the penalty pursuant to the WCE by arguing that the “use” of a weapon does not include the “use” of a weapon as a bargaining asset to complete a drug deal. You are the Judge. Advance a Legal Positivist position and advance a Legal Realist position. Argue both sides. Select the argument that you agree with and explain why you agree with it. Select the argument that you disagree with and explain why you disagree with it. Discuss which argument would “best serve society.” Comment on the postings of your classmates.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BLS 111 Punishment for Wrong Use of a Weapon Discussion

BLS 111 Punishment for Wrong Use of a Weapon Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!