Biomechanics and Primate Locomotion Lab Report
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Biomechanics and Primate Locomotion Lab ReportHere goes round two of Lab Reports. This one is going to pull from two separate VirtualLabs, though you will see that they relate to the same concept. Each of the labsprovides such little content that the two should really be grouped together in creating acohesive whole.Begin this assignment by reading the Lab Exercises for both Lab 3 and Lab 4. Theseare the datasets you will be working with. Sections 2 and 3 of Lab 4 will provide you withgeneral anatomical information regarding the bones you are working with.The goal of the lab report is to make inferences about locomotor behavior by analyzingskeletal material. This is what we do in paleontology. Since we seldom (if ever) find acomplete skeleton, we have come up with a variety of ways to discuss life history,adaptations, and behavior from most elements of the skeleton. This aspect ofpaleontological work encompasses the fields of biomechanics and functionalmorphology. These elements do not always tell us the whole story, but every little bitcounts.Before you dive into your work, I want to clarify what data you are to use. The activity inLab 3 is pretty straight forward. Other than some color-coding issues in the scatter plots,you should not run into many problems. It doesn’t quite show you the parameters formeasuring the Olecranon Process vs the Ulnar Shaft. Do your best by examining theimage on the opening page. Even if you struggle, however, the lab ultimately gives youthe measurements to work with.Lab 4 is unfortunately a little more convoluted. After you get through the review ofScientific Method, the lab shows you how to measure the Humerofemoral Index. This isyour primary metric for this activity. After you go through the motions of obtaining thisindex, however, Kappelman gives you a different metric (the Intermembral Index) aswell as body mass. Ignore these! Proceed in this report only by using the indices thatyou measured (Olecranon-Ulnar & Humerofemoral). The lab explains that thismeasurement can be used as an approximate for the Intermembral Index and so that ishow we will use it. It is important to treat this exercise as if you only have three bones tostudy (Humerus, Ulna, Femur). When reporting on the intermembral index, state clearlythat you are using the Humerofemoral Index as a proxy. This will not ruin yourinterpretation as it plots in the same general area. Honestly, I don’t know why he throwsextra data at you. It’s unnecessary and less realistic.I also want you to ignore the body mass provided for you (also unrealistic). You areasked to make assumptions about body mass in your conclusions. In plotting theHumerofemoral index on the Intermembral Index plot, you will see a range of body sizesthat are common for this Index. That is what you discuss.Finally, ignore the behavioral data. If you could study these primates in real time theiridentity would not be a mystery…Lab Report 2: Biomechanics and Primate LocomotionBetween Labs three and four, Kappelman provides students with two metric activities.These focus on a specimen titled “mystery primate”. Students are provided with threeosteological elements to assess: the Ulna, the Humerus, and the Femur. With these inhand, two separate biomechanical indices are obtainable. The Olecranon-Ulnar indexmeasures the length of the Olecranon Process relative to the length of the Ulnar Shaft.The Humerofemoral index measures the relative proportion of the forelimb to hindlimb.Each of these indices can be used to make assumptions about the mystery primate’slocomotor style.This lab report will be an exercise in paleontology. Students are said to have foundthese three elements and are asked to provide insight into the locomotor style. Yourreport should follow the following outline/answer the follow question.Introduction (In any order, include the following)-Explain what is meant by locomotion and the four common primate locomotor stylesdiscussed in the lecture.-Explain the scenario. Your team has discovered three primate limb bones and youhave been tasked with determining the animal’s mode of locomotion.-Thesis statementHere is your googled definition of a thesis statement: A thesis statement isone sentence that expresses the main idea of a research paper or essay, such as anexpository essay or argumentative essay. It makes a claim, directly answering aquestion.Materials and Methods-What are the elements you are working with-What are the indices that you will be calculating-how are they calculatedResults-What are the index values-Where do they fit in the plots provided in the lab-which species do they plot with?(feel free to copy and paste the scatter plots as well)DiscussionGeneral statement regarding this data and the overall locomotor pattern.Discuss your findings beyond the simple locomotor classification (not just one of thefour categories discussed above). There are low values and high values for eachgrouping. The differences reflect variations of that particular group. (this is explained inthe lab content)Explain the function of the indices. Why are the limbs building this way? What are thefunctional specifics? (explained in the lab content)Can we make assumptions about body mass?ConclusionsAssuming that the Mystery Primate is a known species, what species do yourmeasurements suggest it is (refer to the scatter plots)? What sort of environment wouldyou expect to find it in? Given its locomotor style and assumed body mass, whatpredictions could you possibly make about its diet? What other data would you need toconfirm your predictions?Biomechanics and Primate Locomotion Lab Report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Biomechanics and Primate Locomotion Lab Report
Biomechanics and Primate Locomotion Lab Report