Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

In at least 250 words (total), address how Green’s Scientific American article aligns with

the core principles of science communication and the tips we learned from Wu.

(1) Discuss how you believe Green’s article accounts for his audience using a

particular framing and language by completing the following:

(a) Identify ONE audience you believe that Green was hoping to address.

(b) Identify the framing you believe Green chose, and discuss how he supported this

framing through his language.

Note: Do not take up too much space with direct quotes from Green here. Rather,

discuss how Green used language in his piece to support the framing you feel he

chose, and do so using strategically-chosen–but short–direct quotes from the text if you

wish.)

(2) Second, did Green’s article uphold any of the science communication tips we

learned from Wu? Recall that the tips we learned involved getting rid of the ideas that

communication gaps are due to knowledge; that there is finality in science; and that all

communication is good communication.

(a) State whether or not you believe Green’s piece aligned with any of Wu’s tips. If YES,

state the tip you think Green most aligned with (you need only mention ONE).

(b) Explain why you took the above stance.

If YES, briefly explain how you believe Green lived up to Wu’s suggestion.

If NO, briefly explain how you believe Green could have better lived up to one of Wu’s

suggestions (you need only discuss one).

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-cant-scientists-talk-like-regular-

humans/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-vision-for-the-next-decade-of-human-

genomics-research/

Biology and Society Genome Editing Discussion Questions

In at least 250 words (total), and drawing on Gaieck et al. (2020), Sternberg et al.

(2015), and (if you wish) any of the other knowledge you gained in this biology and

society course, convince your Congresswoman–who has no training in science–that the

NHGRI’s budget for genome editing work should be increased.

(1) State the framing for your request. (This could be a medical framing, an economic

framing, a biological framing, or something else.) In other words, describe the broad

reason why an increase in the NHGRI’s genome editing budget would be valuable for

your local district OR the country at large.

(2) Using language you believe would be accessible to your Congresswoman provide

evidence, from Gaieck et al. (2015) or any other Module in this course, that CRISPR

research has shown promise in the lab in relation to the framing you provided. Note:

You can think of this part of the assignment as flipping the audience of the Sternberg et

al. (2015) piece from scientists to a policymaker.

(3) Explain to your Congresswoman how you plan on following up to evaluate whether

your request to her has been effective.

Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

Biology and Society Article Essay Questions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!