- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
Scientific Method Paper
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report
Below are two examples of how scientists use the Scientific Method to conduct research.
Read & Complete the following report form by answering the questions in Part A & B.
Part A. “The Strange Case of BeriBeri”
In 1887 a strange nerve disease attacked the people in the Dutch East Indies. The disease was beriberi. Symptoms of the disease included weakness and loss of appetite; victims often died of heart failure. Scientists thought the disease might be caused by bacteria. They injected chickens with bacteria from the blood of patients with beriberi. The injected chickens became sick. However, so did a group of chickens that were not injected with bacteria.
One of the scientists, Dr. Eijkman, noticed something. Before the experiment, all the chickens had eaten whole-grain rice, but during the experiment, the chickens were fed polished rice. Dr. Eijkman researched this interesting case. He found that polished rice lacked thiamine, a vitamin necessary for good health.
Answer the questions and follow instructions below to submit form for Part A.
State the Problem.
What was the hypothesis? Include any background information that related to the formation of this hypothesis.
How was the hypothesis tested? Include any methods or materials that the scientist used in the experiment.
Should the hypothesis be supported or rejected based on the experiment? Include the results of the experiment and any discussion you feel that is relevant to support or deny the hypothesis.
Conclusion: What should be the new hypothesis?
Part B: “How Penicillin Was Discovered”
In 1928, Sir Alexander Fleming was studying Staphylococcus bacteria growing in culture dishes. He noticed that a mold called Penicillium was also growing in some of the dishes. A clear area existed around the mold because all the bacteria that had grown in this area had died. In the culture dishes without the mold, no clear areas were present.
Fleming hypothesized that the mold must be producing a chemical that killed the bacteria. He decided to isolate this substance and test it to see if it would kill bacteria. Fleming transferred the mold to a nutrient broth solution. This solution contained all the materials the mold needed to grow. After the mold grew, he removed it from the nutrient broth. Fleming then added the nutrient broth in which the mold had grown to a culture of bacteria. He observed that the bacteria died.
Answer the questions and follow instructions below to submit form for Part B.
Identify the problem.
What was Fleming’s hypothesis? Include any background information that related to the formation of this hypothesis.
How was the hypothesis tested? Include any methods or materials that the scientist used in the experiment.
Should the hypothesis be supported or rejected based on the experiment? Include the results of the experiment and any discussion you feel that is relevant to support or deny the hypothesis.
Conclusion: What should be the new hypothesis? (This experiment leads to the development of what major medical advancement?)
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
Bio 1111 Principles of Bio Lab Report essay
