Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

For this Week’s Discussion, you should read Chapter 2 from your textbook for this class
(Costanzo, Physiology) then write your post on “Why a good understanding of
autonomic physiology is imperative in medicine and disease treatment”. Your post
should;
Describe neurotransmitters and receptors of the autonomic nervous system.
Choose one (1) receptor and describe its location(s) and the physiologic effects of its
stimulation.
Describe a pharmacologic agent that targets this receptor and the disease it is used in
treating.

Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion
Replies:
In your first reply to a peer thread, identify another autonomic nervous system receptor
and describe its function.
In your second reply to a peer thread, identify another drug that targets an autonomic
nervous system receptor and the disease it is used to treat.
a minimum of 500 words for discussion and 250 for each reply
https://doctor2016.jumedicine.com/wp-content/uploa…thats the link for the book that i
found so u can look at chapter 2

Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

Autonomic Receptors and Medicine Essay Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!