Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Autism Spectrum Disorder Article ReviewPaper 2 (word file):On a (ONE) current research article (original research, article will be organized asIntroduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) on the selected hormone (same as thehormone in paper 1). Sections (format) of your paper, other than the title and literaturecited –(1) Introduction that states the headings of the sections of the content,(2) Content that is organized into sections and subsections (combine information fromthe introduction, methods, results and discussion of the article into the subsectioncorresponding to it), and contains the information in the research article (format of yourpaper-2 is the same as that of paper-1) (include figures in the article), and(3) Conclusion that states the main information in each of the subsections/sections ofthe content and provides a thesis (of the article) and an original thought (yours).The selection of the article (its breadth and depth) is critical to the quality of your paper.Essential:-adapt the figures to create your own adaptation of the figure-Must be a research article, can’t use a review article, book chapter, online (non-article)information-Must be thorough/complete-must be organized-must show that you understand the information-cite source(s) completely (provide link(s) below the citation)Checklist Paper 2:Article= a (ONE) research article, will be organized as Introduction, Methods, Results,and Discussion sections. The quality/thoroughness of your paper depends on the depthof the article you selectPaper has 3 main parts (Introduction, content, and conclusion) in bold, centeredIntroduction, lists the headings/subheadings in Content sectionContent, the headings (of sections) are in bold/italics; the subheadings (of subsections)are underlinedNo plagiarism, written in your own words. The verbatim sentences, authors words, arewithin quotations(a) adapted the figure(s) in article to create your own adaptations of the figure(s), (b)placed in quotes (quotations) the original figure (as in article), below your created figurePaper is thorough/complete, all of the info in the article is present in the paperConclusion, states the main information, in one sentence each, of each of thesections/subsections of the content.Conclusion, provides a thesis (of the article) and an original thought (yours). Use theword thesis in stating the theses, and give the specifics instead of general statementsAutism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review