Assignment On Caribbean Labor Relations

July 29, 2021

Assignment on Caribbean Labor Relations

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Assignment on Caribbean Labor Relations

INSTRUCTIONS: Complete all of the questions.

DOCUMENT IN WRITING TEN PERCENTAGE

1. Identify and describe THREE (3) difficulties that companies in the Caribbean face in depth.

today. (15 points)

2. Identify and explain THREE (3) possible efforts for employers to address these issues.

challenges. (15 points)

3. Examine how the concepts of social dialogue and social partnership might be used in the workplace.

Today, the Caribbean is dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic. (20 points)

(A total of 50 points)

PERCENTAGE OF ORAL PRESENTATION MARK SCHEME

5 points for presentation organization

5 points for accurate information

Use of audio/visuals and time management are examples of creativity. 5 points

Presentation skills (vocabulary use and information explanation/analysis) 5 points

5 points for answering questions correctly.

(Total of 25 points)

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met