Arbitration
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Arbitration
Arbitration is a process of resolving disputes outside of court through the intervention of a neutral third party called an arbitrator. The arbitrator is typically chosen by the parties involved in the dispute, and the decision reached by the arbitrator is typically binding on the parties.
The process of arbitration is often faster, less expensive, and less formal than going to court. It can be used to resolve a wide range of disputes, including commercial, employment, and consumer disputes.
The process of arbitration typically begins with the parties involved in the dispute signing an arbitration agreement. This agreement outlines the terms of the arbitration, including the rules that will govern the arbitration, the number of arbitrators that will be involved, and the location of the arbitration.
Once the arbitration agreement is signed, the parties will typically select an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators. The arbitrator is usually an expert in the subject matter of the dispute and is selected for their ability to make fair and impartial decisions.
During the arbitration process, each party will have the opportunity to present evidence and make arguments to support their position. The arbitrator will then make a decision based on the evidence and arguments presented.
The decision reached by the arbitrator is typically final and binding, meaning that the parties are obligated to comply with the decision. There is usually no right to appeal an arbitration decision, except in certain limited circumstances.
One of the key advantages of arbitration is that it is a private process. Unlike court proceedings, which are generally open to the public, arbitration hearings are typically held in private. This can be particularly beneficial for parties who wish to keep the details of their dispute confidential.
Another advantage of arbitration is that it is often faster than going to court. Court proceedings can take months or even years to resolve, whereas arbitration proceedings can be completed in a matter of weeks or months.
However, there are also some potential disadvantages to arbitration. For example, the parties involved in the dispute may have less control over the process than they would in court. They may also have fewer opportunities to appeal the decision, and the decision may not be as well reasoned or explained as a court decision.
Overall, arbitration can be an effective way to resolve disputes, particularly for parties who wish to keep the process private and who want a faster and less formal process than going to court. However, it is important to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration before agreeing to participate in the process.
Arbitration
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow