An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

 

APA Article Analysis Lab Assignments 4 and 5

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction:

An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

Loftus, E. F. & Palmer, J. C.

Worth 2 lab assignments – Due Wednesday, April 1, 2020

Total Points: 20

PLEASE BE SURE TO LEAVE THE PROMPTS BELOW IN YOUR DOCUMENT AND PLACE YOUR ANSWERS DIRECTLY UNDERNEATH THE CORREPSONDING QUESTION.

Experiment 1

Indicate the IV and its levels

Indicate the DV

Indicate the hypothesis

How many participants were studied?

List the procedure of the study step-by-step (BE SURE TO FOCUS ON SIMILARITIES and DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT CONDITIONS):

What kind of design is being used (e.g. post-test only between-groups, repeated measures)? Note: not explicitly stated by authors. To help identify the research design: identify whether participants experienced all levels of the IV (within-groups) or experienced only one level of the IV (between-groups); If it is a between-groups design, identify whether or not there was a pretest. If it is a within-groups design, identify whether they experienced all the levels at roughly the same time and then measured on the DV or did they experience them in a sequence/one at a time and get measured on the DV after each level.

Did the data support the hypothesis? Explain. Put into words how the data supported the hypothesis (e.g. those in the ____ group did significantly better on the test than those in the ____group).

What two interpretations of the data did the authors propose?

What was the purpose of Experiment 2?

Experiment 2

Indicate the IV and its levels

Indicate the two DVs in this experiment

Indicate the hypothesis

How many participants were studied?

List the procedure of the study step-by-step (BE SURE TO FOCUS ON SIMILARITIES and DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT CONDITIONS):

What kind of design is being used (e.g. post-test only between-groups, repeated measures)? Note: not explicitly stated by authors

Did the data support the hypothesis? Explain.

What conclusions did the authors draw from the data from Experiments 1 and 2?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

 

An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory’

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!