Action research to study and improve practice in a specific field

 Action research to study and improve practice in a specific field

Instructions

 Action research to study and improve practice in a specific field

Action research is a methodology used to study and improve practices in a specific field. It is a cyclical process that involves four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The goal of action research is to understand a problem or issue in a specific context and then to take action to improve the situation.

The first stage of action research is planning. In this stage, the researcher identifies the problem or issue that they want to study and designs a plan to gather data and take action. They also determine the stakeholders who will be involved in the research and establish clear goals and objectives for the study.

The second stage is acting. This is where the researcher implements their plan and takes action to improve the situation. This can include collecting data, implementing interventions, or making changes to existing practices.

The third stage is observing. In this stage, the researcher collects data on the effects of the actions taken in the previous stage. They may use a variety of data collection methods such as surveys, interviews, or observations.

The final stage is reflecting. This is where the researcher analyzes the data collected in the previous stage and evaluates the effectiveness of the actions taken. They consider whether the goals and objectives were met, and identify any areas for improvement.

One of the key benefits of action research is that it allows for the active involvement of stakeholders in the research process. This can lead to increased buy-in and ownership of the research findings and can ensure that the research is relevant and applicable to the specific context.

Another benefit of action research is that it allows for the iterative testing and refining of interventions or changes. The cyclical nature of the process means that the researcher can make small adjustments and test their effectiveness before making larger changes.

Action research can be applied to a wide range of fields, including education, healthcare, and business. For example, in education, action research can be used to study and improve teaching practices, while in healthcare it can be used to study and improve patient care.

In conclusion, action research is a valuable methodology for studying and improving practices in a specific field. It is a cyclical process that involves four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The active involvement of stakeholders and the iterative testing of interventions are key benefits of this approach. Action research can be applied to a wide range of fields and can lead to practical and relevant solutions to problems and issues

 Action research to study and improve practice in a specific field

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!