A Trait Theory Assignment Is The Big Five

July 29, 2021

A Trait Theory Assignment Is The Big Five

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

A Trait Theory Assignment Is The Big Five

Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness are the five personality traits examined in the Big Five theory. Complete The Big Five Personality Scale for this assignment. Answer the following questions in your assignment after you’ve finished the scale:

Interpret your findings as follows: What was the outcome of the Big Five personality test?
Do you believe the results are correct or incorrect? Why do you think that is?
What significance do the findings have for you?
Give specific examples of how your findings affect you in your daily life.
Aside from the title and reference pages, your paper should be two to three pages long. It should be written in APA style. Make sure to cite your textbook and the assessment, as well as any other sources you want to use. A minimum of two references are required. This assignment is due at 11:59 p.m. CT on Sunday.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met