A Charity Organization Research Paper

A Charity Organization Research Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

A Charity Organization Research Paper

Organization, Research, Paper

This assignment requires me to research a charity organization, we will retrieve information form that organization online including photos from that organization, we will then write about each point listed in the rubric (also attached at the bottom) out of the perspective from the organization.

Here is a list of the points to be addressed by each of us:

Address the following in the presentation:

1. Identification of team members. JUST MAKE UP 4 NAMES AND I WILL CORRECT THEM WHEN COMPLETE
2. Explanation of why I selected the particular opportunity.
3. Description of how I served the individual or community, including the amount of time.
4. Explanation of how the Greenleaf questions were met. “GREENLEAF “as you reflect on your service project experience: “The difference manifests itself in the care taken by the servant-first to make sure that other people’s highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to administer, is as followed:
5. Do those served grow as persons?
6. Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants?
7. And, what is the effect on the least privileged in society? Will they benefit or at least not be further deprived.”
8. Identify which servant leadership skills were used to influence others and how.
9. Description of other significant takeaways.
10. Pictures taken during the service projects. “Pictures from the site or associated with the work. “

 

Also, here are the rubric points that will be graded. FOCUS POINTS!!!

Opportunity- An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.

Area Served– A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.

Greenleaf- An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.

Servant Leadership Skills– An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.

Takeaways- A description of significant takeaways is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.

Pictures- Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are thorough and well-integrated.

Peer Evaluation– Evaluations of self and team members are thorough and provide insightful and well-justified explanations of performance. (Remember, this is for you to submit to Professor Saldana in the Private forum, it is anonymous, but please do not forget about it as it will also reflect your own grade)

Layout- The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. (each us may choose their own layout as this will reflect on the charity chosen and your personality as well, I will only compile it into one big PowerPoint!)

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)- The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)- Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. (we may help each other out in the Google Slide document in real time if we see a mistake, or we can leave a comment on the side for the “author” of that slide to work on it, however, we do not change a person’s entire text or slide…only grammar or spelling mistakes!)

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)– Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. (this is supposed to be in APA style, do not forget to add your references preferably on the last slide in alphabetically o

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

A Charity Organization Research Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!