System Development or Application Assurance Project Solution

System Development or Application Assurance Project

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

System Development or Application Assurance Project

Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance

Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance is a 1week project that explores cybersecurity implications related to software application development or procurement from the cybersecurity risk perspective. The deliverable in Project 4 is a documented procurement process that supports all three of the previous project results. The objective is to demonstrate the value-add of a procurement process that includes security principles, methods, and tools as used in the software development life cycle.

Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance Start Here

It is critical that cybersecurity professionals be able to use all applicable systems, tools, and concepts to minimize risks to an organization’s cyberspace and prevent cybersecurity incidents. In this project, you will demonstrate your understanding of how to apply security principles, methods, and tools within the software development life cycle. You will also apply your knowledge of the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.

This is the fourth and final project for this course. There are 13 steps in this project. Begin below to review your project scenario.

scenario

System Development or Application Assurance

 

Your vulnerability assessment has been completed, and it’s a good thing, because you found several system weaknesses in the area of application software security.

If these weaknesses were exploited, it could ruin your company’s reputation. Not to mention causing major disruptions to operations and unexpected costs.

You plan on following up on these issues this afternoon, but it’s about lunchtime, so you head out for a quick bite to eat.

You pass by Maria Sosa’s office and see her at her desk. You knock on her door frame, peek inside, and ask if she has a minute. Maria motions to you. “Come on in.”

“What brings you to my office?”

You give her a high-level overview of your findings, and tell her that after lunch, you plan to start taking an even closer look.

Maria says: “That sounds great. Can you write up your analysis and recommendations for solutions? I’d like to share this with important stakeholders at the executive meeting next week. How does that sound?”

You nod in agreement. Then you make a beeline back to your office and grab an energy bar from your desk. You need to prepare for your presentation for the meeting next week.

Competencies

Your work will be evaluated using the competencies listed below.

• 1.1: Organize document or presentation clearly in a manner that promotes understanding and meets the requirements of the assignment.
• 1.5: Use sentence structure appropriate to the task, message and audience.
• 2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.
• 9.4: Software Security Assurance: Demonstrate secure principles, methods, and tools used in the software development life cycle.
• 9.5: Software Security Assurance: Describe the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.

Artifacts to submit for this project

1) Software vulnerability assessment

System Development or Application Assurance Project

2) Procurement policy list

3) Software acceptance policy

4) Test script procedures

5) Supply chain cyber security risk report

6) Acquisition alignment report

7) Supply chain risk mitigation final report

THIS IS WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE LAST

ARTIFACT. That is NUMBER 7 artifact above (Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report)

Project 4: Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report

Top of Form

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report

Print Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first-row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Competency

Exceeds Performance Requirements

Meets Performance Requirements

Does Not Meet Performance Requirements

1.1: Organize document or presentation in a manner that promotes understanding and meets the requirements of the assignment.

1.5: Use sentence structure appropriate to the task, message and audience.

2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.

9.4: Demonstrate secure principles, methods, and tools used in the software development life cycle.

9.5: Describe the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow System Development or Application Assurance Project

System Development or Application Assurance Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!