Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities Assignment

Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities Assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities Assignment

Reflections on Your Learning: First Draft (Peer Feedback) [WLO: 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 4]

Part 1

This discussion forum is the first part of a two-part integration. The peer and instructor feedback you receive in this discussion forum will be integrated and submitted in this week’s written assignment. You must provide feedback on your peers’ initial posts by Day 5 of this week.

In this discussion forum, you will reflect on your learning thus far in the course and consider how you will apply what you have learned in your own career. Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, please review your notes on the chapters and articles you have read thus far in the course.

In an initial post of at least 300 words, and referencing at least two scholarly sources,

Reflect on core concepts associated with leadership and management roles and responsibilities.

Discuss what you have learned about leadership and management roles and responsibilities.

Defend what you believe are the most important differences between leadership and management.

Guided Response: Answer any questions your instructor has about your initial post, and review several of your classmates’ posts, prioritizing those who have not received feedback, and respond to at least three of your classmates’ posts by Day 5.

Discuss the extent to which you and your classmate agreed upon the most important differences between leadership and management. Offer suggestions or examples of differences between leadership and management that would help your classmate better understand your perspective or that would reinforce a shared perspective you both have. Each of your responses to your classmates should be at least 100 words in length.

Compile your instructor’s and classmates’ feedback and navigate to this week’s assignment to complete Part 2

WE MUST do this assignment before we write the paper and us the feedback.

Part 2

Prior to beginning this assignment, you must complete the Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities: First Draft (Peer Feedback) discussion and have received feedback. Review the discussion threads you, your classmates, and your instructor posted. Make note of constructive suggestions you can integrate into your own reflection on leadership and management concepts, and incorporate these ideas into the Reflections on Your Learning paper.

Navigate to this week’s discussion forum to review your feedback if necessary:

Week 3 Discussion Forum 3 – First Draft Peer Feedback

In a paper of at least 600 words (excluding title and reference pages), and supported by at least two required scholarly sources, address the first two assignment directives below in a more substantive manner, and respond to the third bullet point.

In the Reflections on Your Learning paper,

Discuss what you have learned about leadership and management roles and responsibilities.

Defend what you believe are the most important differences between leadership and management.

Identify, based on what you have learned thus far, key leadership and management skills or competencies you hope to develop to strengthen your own capabilities as a leader or manager.

The Reflections on Your Learning paper must be at least 600 words in length (exclusive of title and reference pages), and reference at least two required scholarly sources. Include title and reference pages in your paper; this paper does not require an abstract. Format your paper according to APA Style as outlined in the  Writing Center’s  APA Style (Links to an external site.)  resource. Use resources listed in the Week 1 assignment to help you correctly format your paper.

Ponder interactions you have had with primary care health care providers in recent years.

Now that you have reviewed models for clinical decision-making construct a discussion that reflects on an encounter you have had with a primary care provider.

Utilize one of the models presented in your lecture materials, or any other model that you may like, to frame your discussion of the experience with the primary care provider that you are reflecting on.

Be sure to paraphrase information relative to the elements of the model where appropriate and utilize in-text citations consistent with APA guidelines.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities Assignment

Managing Doctoral Study Responsibilities Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!