The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown

The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown

You will need all of those components for the last paper. This is why you are given two weeks to prepare for it (you have no Week Four assignment if you will notice). Everything comes together for the final paper – all six RESEARCH articles, the review of the qualitative research article (including method and results), the review of the quantitative research article (including method and results). The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown, and a clear discussion of the evidence-based practice change being proposed.

Here is a good outline of what is expected of (or how to put together) the final paper, this is an announcement I usually post in the middle of week Four, but I can state it here since you asked.

Most of the papers are brought together into this way:

Title Page

part 1 – Title of the paper and Background on the topic

part 2 – PICOT statement/question, with breakdown of each element Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time

part 3 – qualitative research critique – problem, method, results, ethical considerations

part 4 – quantitative research critique – problem, method, results, ethical considerations

part 5 – specific discussion of proposed EBP change

Conclusion

References

This is what often works.

Please remember to answer the requirements of the assignment guidelines and the grading rubric.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown

The PICOT question, the PICOT breakdown

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!