Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

Short Paper “SP” Explanation

SPs should in some way touch upon at least one of the required readings, and attending themes, that we have addressed during the given timeframe. You may also wish to bring in other readings/sources, whether from or beyond those covered in the course. Finally, you also may want to [hint, hint] draw upon other relevant research and scholarship in these papers, which will entail a certain “added” initiative (a trip to the actual or virtual library, perhaps?) on your part. The ultimate goal of writing SPs is to cultivate the development of your own critical, analytical, and creative voice.

 

Things to consider in writing your SPs:

 

Isolate a specific concept/theme/topic in the text(s) that most piqued your interest.

How is this concept/theme/topic analyzed by the author?

How is this concept/theme/topic relevant to the author’s overall argument or claim?

What questions or concerns do you have about this concept/theme/topic? (Your questions or concerns constitute the beginning of your own argument and analysis. In other words, your argument and analysis will ultimately be your attempt to address these questions or concerns.)

Offer your own argument and analysis concerning the specific concept/theme/topic you have isolated.

What is your “take”?

Support your argument (consider examples).

Consider contemporary applications of ideas discussed in reading (e.g. through art, music, literature, film, other media; through social/cultural/political themes and discourses; etc.)

What’s at stake? (Who cares? Would anyone disagree with what you’re arguing?)

Focus, focus, focus.

 

Technical requirements for SPs:

Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

Use footnotes or endnotes. [In Microsoft Word, this should be as easy as choosing “References” in the top menu and then choosing either “Insert Footnote” or “Insert Endnote.” In scholarly parlance, this mode of citation is typically called Chicago style. I have included sample paper using Chicago style in the Content area of our Blackboard course.]

4 pages minimum (excluding any bibliography, title page, etc.)

“Common” font (e.g. Times New Roman, Garamond)

12” font size

Double-spaced

Left-justified

1” margins

Paginated (header or footer acceptable)

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

Technical requirements for SPs Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!