Air France Financial Statements From 2015

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Air France Financial Statements From 2015

Question Description

Use the Air France FINANCIAL STATEMENTS from 2015

Part A: Financial Statements, Income Measurement and Current Assets

1. What amount did AF report for the following items for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015?

1. Total Revenues
2. Income from current operations
3. Net Income or Net Loss
4. Total Assets
5. Total Equity

Part B: Property. Plant and Equipment and Intangibles Assets

2. Describe the approach AF uses to determine fixed impairment losses. (Hint see Note 4.14) How does this approach differ from US GAAP?

Part C: Investments

3. Read Notes 24 and 36.4. Focusing on investments accounted for at fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL):
4. As of December 31, 2015, what is the total balance of those investments balance sheet?
5. How much of that balance is classified as current and how much as noncurrent?
6. How much of the fair value of those investments is accounted for using level 1, level 2 and level 3 inputs of the fair value hierarchy? Given that information asses the reliability (representational faithfulness) of this fair value estimate.

Part D: Liabilities

4. Is the threshold for recognizing a provision under IFRS different than it is under US GAAP? Explain.

Part E: Shareholder’s Equity and Additional Financial Reporting Issues

5. AF lists for items in the shareholders’ equity section of its Balance Sheet. If AF used US GAAP, what would be the likely account titles for the first and fourth of those components?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!