IEEE, Science Direct, EBCOHOST, and SCOPUS Journal Discussion

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

IEEE, Science Direct, EBCOHOST, and SCOPUS Journal Discussion

Question Description

1. a) Introduction of the topic: 0Describe what is the definition of the topic assigned
2. b) Please explain in detail what is the topic explanation and also please discuss among the group member about the topic
3. c) Please expend a journal search as your references (10 references based on 7th APA formatting) and cited some of a good journal (from IEEE, Science Direct, EBCOHOST, and SCOPUS), not from the website
4. d) Conclusion of your topic- discuss about the advantages and disadvantages of your topic.

The topic explanation must be characterized with the following formatting:

1. a) Analyze the element that you think is important and essential highlighted in the journal please use the infographic format for instance you can have a list, figure and table to disseminate your understanding.
2. b) Please criticize the journals that you have been selected (please refer to the journals) the advantages and disadvantage of the topic due to the significant of Software Engineering (You can also use the table and flow chart).
3. c) Interpret the importance of your topic based on your understanding.
4. d) Conclude your discussion by summarize all of the topic value for the future work.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!