BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Discussion
Read the posts of your peers and post scholarly responses to the initial posts of two. Ask clarifying questions or provide a different perspective on transformational and adaptive leadership.
Student post down below:
Transformational leadership is a leadership style that can inspire positive changes in those who follow. Transformational leaders are generally energetic, enthusiastic, and passionate. Not only are these leaders concerned and involved in the process; they are also focused on helping every member of the group succeed as well. Through the strength of their vision and personality, transformational leaders are able to inspire followers to change expectations, perceptions, and motivations to work towards common goals.
According to Northouse et al. 2019, “Adaptive leadership is about how leaders encourage people to adapt to face and deal with problems, challenges, and changes. Adaptive leadership focuses on the adaptations required of people in response to changing environments.”
(Northouse 2019, p.257) Adaptive leadership utilizes all employees and customers to find solutions that work. Adaptive leaders know how to get results in an ever-changing environment. They read the terrain, are well-prepared and expect plans to change. Leaders exhibiting an adaptive style are performance motivated, self-aware, and generally have high levels of emotional intelligence. They assign the right tasks to the right people and they regularly provide resources for professional development.
While transformational leadership and adaptive leadership are quite different styles of leadership, they can both be effective when used together to help organizations face challenging times. Both transformational leadership and adaptive leadership represent appropriate and critical leadership styles for organizations that strive to keep the pace of continuous cultural and technological advancements and that are focused on the rapid adoption of new organizational concepts and process improvements.
When an organization finds themselves facing changing or trying times, it would be beneficial to have a transformational leader guiding the organization. Transformational leaders look for the opportunity in change. When change happens, transformational leaders practice finding the positives in it rather than the negatives. While transformational leadership is often ideal in most organizations there are some instances when a transformational leader might find themselves facing resistance from his or her followers.
While change and adaptation are essential for many organizations, risks taken through transformational leadership can sometimes be disruptive. Transformational leaders use their charismatic approach to serve as a role model for their followers and their organization.
They use this energy to show people how to achieve goals or accomplish tasks. There are certain risks that are generally accepted by those using this leadership style to find innovation or create change. If the leader accepts risks that are, or perceived to be, excessive or unnecessary, then the actions of the leader become detrimental to the team and their organization, thus creating resistance or internal employee struggles.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Discussion
BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Discussion