Social Science Child Development Discussion Paper
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Social Science Child Development Discussion Paper
Help me study for my Social Science class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.
Since no group selected Cerebral Palsy or Spina Bifida for their special report, I want to be sure you have some resources related to these two disabilities.
Check out several of the resources below.
Choose one of the websites to investigate more in depth.
Consider the the following for your discussion post:
What website/organization did you explore in depth? If you were a parent of a child with either of these two disabilities, how would you rate the website? What information did you find that you believe would be useful for parents? How did the website connect you to other families of children with disability or to additional community resources?
Resources for children and/or adults with Cerebral Palsy:
https://www.ucpsd.org/ (Links to an external site.)
https://first5sandiego.org/parent-portal/helpful-links/ (Links to an external site.)
https://miracleleagueofsandiego.org/community/ (Links to an external site.)
http://efrconline.org/ (Links to an external site.)
Resources for children and/or adults with Spina Bifida:
https://www.spinabifidasandiego.com/forum (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)https://www.radyfoundation.org/sbsd (Links to an external site.)
https://www.spinabifidaassociation.org/clinics/ (Links to an external site.)
https://www.sdrc.org/index.php/who-is-eligibile/ (Links to an external site.)
Social Science Child Development Discussion Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Social Science Child Development Discussion Paper
Social Science Child Development Discussion Paper