BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Response Essay

BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Response Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Response Essay

Read the posts of the other learners and post scholarly responses to two of your peers. Offer suggestions for improving the functioning of the team or shared leadership. Include text concepts, relevant research, and professional or practical experiences to support your responses.

Student post down below:

Hill’s Team Model is well known as it provides the leader or a team with a mental road map, to diagnose team problems and to take appropriate action to correct team problems (Northouse, 2007). The Hill model explains in which leader will determine an action of the team member that will certainly make an organization’s operation effective under the leader evaluation. The leader decides whether to take action or not and that it’s base on various external and internal factors.

The first leader takes all the information from the environment and then structures that information. If there is any delicacy in the organization, action will be taken by a leader. This model focuses on the relationship between leadership decision and team effectiveness.

Leadership decision includes internal and external leadership action (Hoch, 2013). Internal leadership include task such as goal focusing, facilitating result, training, maintaining standards and structuring for a result, and another factor of internal leadership is relational that describes coaching, collaborating, modeling principle, satisfying needs, managing conflicts and building commitment.

External leadership actions include all environmental factors; these are networking, sharing information, Buffering, advocating, assessing, and negotiating support (Phillips & Baron, 2018). The effectiveness of the team can be calculated by the performance and development of the organization.

The leader analyzes the problem and evaluates which issue needs intervention and make multiple alternatives that can solve the issue. Examples include senior management executives, task force, and project manager that aims at making strategies of comparative advantage, quick response, and versatility (Hoch, 2013).

Outcomes could be better decision making, enhances the quality of goods and services, critical thinking, innovative strategies, greater productivity, sustainable use of the resources and motivation to the employee in the organization. It helps a leader to identify the strength and weaknesses of an employee. This study helps the human service organization to improve quality and problem correction.

A real-world experience I’d like to share is how my team organization takes action as a team to improve a team’s ability to get the job done. First, we decide who is in charge of the internal and the external.

The CEO’s task is maintaining standards, structuring for successful results, and most importantly makes sure he gains the trust of the team by supporting each team member. The other business partner keeps the team connected to the environment by networking, advocating for the team, and examines the clientele satisfaction.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Response Essay

BUSI 345 Leadership Theory and Practices Response Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!