BUSI 345 Breakdown of Leadership Decision Making

BUSI 345 Breakdown of Leadership Decision Making

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BUSI 345 Breakdown of Leadership Decision Making

Read the posts of the other learners and post scholarly responses to two of your peers. Offer suggestions for improving the functioning of the team or shared leadership. Include text concepts, relevant research, and professional or practical experiences to support your responses.

Student post down below:

The Hill Model gives a through breakdown of leadership decision making. This leadership model places a supervisory individual in the forefront who gives direction and monitor the reactions of his orders. This model provides methodological layout of how a team works together for a common goal. This model also allows a leader to make effective decisions to so a team can get the praise instead of one individual receiving credit for the accomplished goal.

This leadership model would assist within a human service organization by having one individual who set goals, productivity, and deadlines. This leader has the ability to diagnose correctly and choose right actions (Northouse, 2019). By following this model, it enables for one to access all predicaments and distribute to each team who can complete the task effectively. For most human services organization provide several options of care along with different demographics.

Some of the key factors needed for a team to run effectively is collaborative climate and external support and recognition. These key elements give the ability of a team to collaborate or work well together is essential to team effectiveness and A supportive organizational context includes material resources, rewards for excellent performance, an educational system to develop necessary team skills, and an information system to provide data needed to accomplish the task. A common mistake is to give organizational teams challenging assignments but fail to give them organizational support to accomplish these assignments.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BUSI 345 Breakdown of Leadership Decision Making

BUSI 345 Breakdown of Leadership Decision Making

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!