Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

You are a medical social worker in a hospital. Mr John, age 75, is a divorcee who lives alone in a small apartment. Three months ago, he was found unconscious at home by a befriender who visits him regularly. Mr John was immediately sent to the
hospital.

Medical investigations found that he had suffered a mild stroke and was subsequently started on treatment. Mr John has responded well to treatment and now needs to be transferred to step-down care at the Community Hospital, where he can
continue another 6 months of rehabilitation.
During the recent discussion with the medical team regarding his long-term care plan, Mr John was insistent on being discharged home. He does not wish to be transferred to the Community Hospital. Mr John is very concerned about the medical bill, as he does not have adequate savings, nor is he covered under insurance.

As he has been staying in the hospital for more than three months, he is also worried about the state of his home.
You have noted that Mr John has three adult children and has been trying to contact them to see if it is possible for them to use their savings to pay for Mr John’s medical fee (including the fee that may be incurred at the Community Hospital).
Unfortunately, all the three children were uncooperative and claimed that ever since Mr John had divorced their mother many years ago, they had severed relationship with Mr John.

Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study
The medical team’s professional opinion is Mr John needs an extended period of rehabilitation and would not be suitable to discharge home. They warned that if Mr John is to suffer another stroke, the consequence could be fatal.

You are the medical social worker in-charge of this case and the multidisciplinary team comprising the doctor, nurses, and yourself has called for a case conference to discuss the ethical problem posed in this case. Using the
Loewenberg and Dolgoff’s Ethical Principle Screen, analyse what is this model about and how it can be used to resolve the ethical problem presented in Mr John’s case. With reference to the social workers’ code of ethics from NASW (National Association of Social Workers), discuss how a social worker’s responsibility to clients is relevant for you when managing this case.

Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

Clinical Social Work Law and Morals Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!